denzie
What you are doing defies math. If you wait for dozen 1 to triple, you have 1,1,1. At that point, you have exactly the same chance of getting a 2 or 3 as if you had never waited for 1,1,1. I can take you through any trot of numbers and show where three dozens or columns will be followed by the same number to the point where you will break even and only lose to the zero.
This is virtually the same thing John Legend proposed and I tested it thoroughly. He left the forum in disgrace or something.
If you're making money, I am happy for you. Just beware....
TwoCat
What you are doing defies math. If you wait for dozen 1 to triple, you have 1,1,1. At that point, you have exactly the same chance of getting a 2 or 3 as if you had never waited for 1,1,1. I can take you through any trot of numbers and show where three dozens or columns will be followed by the same number to the point where you will break even and only lose to the zero.
This is virtually the same thing John Legend proposed and I tested it thoroughly. He left the forum in disgrace or something.
If you're making money, I am happy for you. Just beware....
TwoCat