Eddy, I have a few questions, please. I will put them in red by your statements.
I have tested this for a few weeks now with Wiesbaden live spins and the results are very good so I would like to hear your opinions about it.
I tested like this:
- only play the first dozen, this is the way I played it but just chose your own bet selection !Since bet selection doesn't make a difference in the long run, why not?
- start to play with 2 units I don't understand why you start with 2 instead of 1. And if 2 works better, why not 3 or 4?
- ad a unit after a loss till you are on a new high
- then return to the 2 unit bet
- If you win your bet but your are not on a new high, play the same bet size again. So only add one unit after a loss.I think this is a good move. When we're betting large bets, why not drop back when we win something like 2 times in a row or 2 out of 3 bets or maybe if a single win drops you back quite a bit, say 1/2 to 3/4 of what you were down, you might consider decreasing the size of your bet here also. Anything to mitigate the effect of a really bad run starting when you're betting large bets.
I saw something like this on the forum already but I made a little twist to prevent big drawdowns.
- adjust your betsize if you are within one spin from a new high....within one spin or maybe 2 or even 3 spins.................. example: you have to bet 21 units but you are only 6 units from a new high, then play 3 instead of 21 units. 3 units will bring you to a new high after a win. If you lose that bet you ad one and play 4 units. Let's say our next bet is 25 and we're at -100. A couple of wins brings us clear, but a few losses (few can be anywhere from 3 to 20 and at 25 + units per loss, we're in big trouble. Why not calculate how much we would have to bet if we won the next 2 bets. This gets our bet size down quite a bit. It reduces our risk in exchange for a longer time to reach full recovery.
I tested this for a few thousand spins already and it goes smoothly. It is also easy to controle the progression.