Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13528

Re: Silverthorne tracker roulette

$
0
0
First of all the name tracker is a little misleading.  There's no tracker per se.  The system is called a tracker.
If you want to know how to play the bet selection and progressions, you must read those sections of the book.  They're the only parts that are important.  The rest is filler that we all should know.

There are 3 stages of progressions.  Fast Profits, Rapid Recovery and Profit Multiplier.

Basically you start playing the Fast Profits progression which is a (1-2-5-8-12) bet line.  If you lose a couple of times playing this line, you jump to the Rapid Recovery progression (2-4-10).  A win on any of these three bets and you jump back to the Fast Profits line at the next bet level as if you hadn't had any losses.  If you win 4 times in a row in the Fast Profits line, you jump to the Profit Multiplier line (2-2-3-4-6-8-10).  A loss here and you're back to the Fast Profits line.  That's a nutshell summary.  The numbers are mine based on $1 units. 

My summary.  You start betting using a pretty basic bet line and you have two directions you can go depending on how you're doing.  If your winning, you move to a bet line that is more stable but nets you good profit.  If you do bad, you jump to an aggressive bet line that recovers your 2 losses quickly and jumps you back to your base bet line.

Any time you have enough losses to reach the end of a line, you just reset to your Fast Profits line.

So, you start with a moderate risk line and if you're doing well, you move to a less risky line so as not to give back all your winnings.  But if you hit a couple of losses in a row, you jump to an aggressive bet line that has high risk, but if you get lucky you will recover your recent losses and can jump back to your basic line.

I don't have time to get more precise in my explanation.  Just read the chapters on bet selection and bet progressions and work through the examples and you have all the explanation you will need.

I admit that it takes a few readings including the examples to get a firm handle on the system, but with perseverance you will come out understanding it.

Is it worth the effort?  I've never tested it enough to decide one way or the other.

GLC

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13528

Trending Articles