Hi denzie,
P.A already said his system for Red and Black could fail and that as it stood there was a FLAW that needed rectifying.
My idea was simply a tweak to try and improve his existing method; to try and make safer in case of the unexpected and bad distribution and variance which he showed can happen in his demo session betting one side of an EC on the other thread.
If anyone else can contribute constructive ideas or suggestions toward ironing out the inherent FLAW(s) then this will surely be a positive step forward to further progress on that front.
Yes - I agree we should not expect to win win win all of the time with such methods as these.
A.
PS. I'm not sure whether PA has already got the answer to this (HG) or if this is his clumsy way to get US to help and cooperate in finding such a solution for us all. He is reluctant to divulge or share much of the detail if he does possess the answer. He seems to relish repeating facts and preaching a lot...
P.A already said his system for Red and Black could fail and that as it stood there was a FLAW that needed rectifying.
My idea was simply a tweak to try and improve his existing method; to try and make safer in case of the unexpected and bad distribution and variance which he showed can happen in his demo session betting one side of an EC on the other thread.
If anyone else can contribute constructive ideas or suggestions toward ironing out the inherent FLAW(s) then this will surely be a positive step forward to further progress on that front.
Yes - I agree we should not expect to win win win all of the time with such methods as these.
A.
PS. I'm not sure whether PA has already got the answer to this (HG) or if this is his clumsy way to get US to help and cooperate in finding such a solution for us all. He is reluctant to divulge or share much of the detail if he does possess the answer. He seems to relish repeating facts and preaching a lot...