Thinking about statistics now. Out of the 27 combinations that is possible, 3 will be one dozen in 3 spins, 6 will be 3 dozens in 3 spins and 18 will be 2 dozens in 3 spins.
And I have question about difference in those combinations.
It is not the case that in every 27 combinations of 3 dozens there will be perfectly equal distribution of sets of 3 as you showed above. So what are extremes here and how much that can negative influence on us?
Coz we know that for example we can face 27 (or even more) of the same dozen in a row, which would be 9 sets of 3 in a row, which should happen 3 times in a verage in 81 spins. And we know that already in 30 spins we can face 10.
No matter how you dissect the game and which odds you create, at this stage this is still fight against variance.
So just this is one proof that in order to achieve so low DD or creating an edge there must something else or more elements to it. In this form this is still just pure fight against variance, isnt it?
Cheers
Drazen