Not identical, but you can see above, pg 201 is a challenge.
Not sure what to do with it.
Ideas?
When questionable situations occur, it opens up a whole new can of
worms and many variables. One thought is that the increasing regularity
of bet size, considering the lay aspect, is dangerous. That's kind of
obvious.
Another thought that I've had in general about progressions, is that
one thing that leads them to fatality is the idea that recovery from a
drawdown has to be immediate and compete.
Using these two concepts, I think, might help in self preservation.
Just to add a footnote, this experience in testing is not unique for me. Like I have
said in the past, it usually doesn't take me more than 2-3 pages of testing to find a
weak spot or a potential blow out. That is good news in that, I don't have to
waste my time with false hopes. Although if you do experience 10-15 winning sessions,
one loss is hardly a failure.
The deception is, when I read about people who, somehow, test 10's of thousands of results
with no loss, yet I seem to just pull a rabbit out of my hat. I can see the hope and skepticism
on both sides. But I see my reality. And I don't manufactur it. Just turn to the page of data documented.