Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13528

Re: Blue Angel's HG (Fallacious)

$
0
0
ill try and simplify things:

* if anyone believes the martingale is the hg, go make millions. Put everyone else to shame.

* If you dont understand the difference between odds and payouts, learn the difference.

If you think any one of the following is true for proper rng, show me any conclusive proof of concept, and i promise ill pay you $100k and close every roulette site i have

* Betting hot or cold numbers changes odds

* Progression or changing bet size changes odds

* Any particular sequence of spins changes the odds of future spins

* winning in short term changes the odds of those spins

* you have a better chance of winning with progression

* you can consistently beat roulette without changing the odds, aka increasing the accuracy of predictions (most important)

Please, on any of the forums, this is an open challenge. Im calling everyone out here. The alabalahs, the kavs, and whoever. Please, make an idiot of me. Instead of calling me names and accusing me of trying to hide winning systems, make a total ass out of me. If you cant, then shut up.

I swear on my life this is an honest challenge. Not just because im sure im right, but also because it would mean the HG exists, and i would earn more than $100k from it.


Clarifying issues:

* Odds are the chances of winning.

* Payouts are amount you are paid on wins

* If you havent changed the odds, every spin is independent and progression like the martingale are nothing but different size bets on different spins, each with the same odds.

* With different sized bets like positive progression (increasing bet after losses) the payouts are different for wins, but the amount you risk losing are proportionally greater too.

* Without a method of bet selection that changes the odds, no money management can help you win. I mean it wont help at all. Zilch. All money management does is change amount you risk.


Personal facts:

* My explanations of these basic facts have sweet FA (nothing) to do with anything i sell.

* Im an honest person with nothing to hide. I say it exactly as it is. I would be ashamed to hide anything. Its not who i am. It is pathetic to have to lie. If i ever felt the need to lie, it would mean something about my life needs to change. I am comfortable with who i am and have no problem looking in the mirror. If anyone doesnt believe it, whoopie for them.

* Most people earn around $150/day for 8 hours work, then after tax are left with around $100. You do it almost every day for about 45 years. After living expenses, saving or accumulating wealth on such a wage is nearly impossible. And when you retire at 65, if youre lucky you own your own a small house and have a small retirement fund. And you will have spent your whole life working, not living. I chose roulette because it does better than the pathetic other option. But it doesnt work everywhere and is not always easy.

* My primary focus with roulette is using my techology, not selling it. But i have multiple businesses too that have nothing to do with roulette. i live comfortably and do not need to lie to sell anything.

* Anyone can easily find the truth about my computers, including a free trial, personal demo, public demo, live webcam demo etc. It can be on any wheel. You can even record spins from a casino and ill test on it. Its not like i could cheat because i would have never even seen the wheel before.

* If you think my trying to explain why the martingale fails is a plot to sell something, or if you think i hate systems like the kavouras bet or BAs hg, you are deluded.

* Almost everyone who attacks me is a system seller. Even the very few who arent sellers have a personal vendetta for reasons like they were banned for spamming, they had an argument with me about the martingale etc.

* Anyone who attacks me tends to use rubbish spread by others also who have vendetta. And thry dont give a crap about the accuracy of their claims. Accuracy is not their goal. It is to discredit, with prejudice, and without integrity. To anyone who does proper research, the truth is clear and they see im honest. And they see the manipulation and lack of integrity of my attackers.

* If youre one of the people who think roulette computer players are dishonest cheats, consider i personally dont cheat, by the legal definition. You can have your 9-5 slavery. We wont judge you for that. But im guessing we live more comfortable lives than you, only at the expense of casinos that take billions from people and families trying to make more money to survive. Boo hoo for the casinos and billionaires.


Roulette computer facts:

* To a layman, its cheating. The fact is in around half casinos, its legal and not cheating by legal definition. But casinos can still ban users if caught. But they will ban ANY consistent winner as a last resort.

* Banning is comparatively rare. In most cases, if computer players are suspected, the casino simply calls no more bets earlier until the player loses or leaves.

* Computers can easily win millions in a day. Even other AP methods can. It has been done. But it kicks a hornets nest, like it did with the ritz team.

* I sell computers ranging between $2000 - $80,000. The differences are huge, but mainly its because better versions beat a much broader range of wheels, are more covert so you win more without detection, easier to use, more accurate, quicker to use, and get earlier predictions. Theres a comparison page on my site.

* My claim of 93% win rate with 15 numbers is not the biggest joke, like alabalah said. He just never saw the video of my publuc demo where i show it. Really its simple if you pay attention: http://youtu.be/PUqjvSvEnX8

so alabalah, what or whos the biggest joke?

* The video above shows an edge of 120%. The casinos edge is just -2.7%. So with the computer, using basic settings, thats an edge around 40 times greater than the casinos. Do the math.


Visual ballistics facts:

* To someone who doesnt know anything about it, vb and predicting with eyesight is impossible. Actually it is very easy for anyone with reasonable eyesight, the right wheel, and a brain.

General facts

* Almost evet new player begins with the martingale and same approaches. And they do not understand why they fail, until later when they become more experienced. Even i was no different.

* Inexperienced players think the experienced players are arrogant by saying things like you need to increase accuracy of predictions. The inexperienced players really have no idea.

* There are many experienced players on the forums who offer mostly accurate advice. Some people learn. But the majority dont listen or learn, and they dont understand the core facts of roulette. So all their systems are fundamentally the same., and they are unable to revognize a losing system when they see it. Take BAs system. An experienced player knows its just betting cold numbers with martingale. Tested a billion times before.

For those that think the kavouras bets, the BA systems or whatever work, just find out for yourself. But i hope you learn from it. When you understand core facts, you will see the delusion you had before. Im not the only one here trying to help, but then you may also better understand i dont give a shit if you dont buy my products. I really am just trying to help.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13528

Trending Articles