Notto: and surely I respect that. It is not that I am not disapproving anything you do, I just want to make sense out of it. But so far your strategy has been paying off so no complaints ![;D]( "Grin")
Good luck!
Foolwise: that looks really interesting. Do you think you would be able incorporate bankroll progression for all the 1600 trials? Than look at box 2,3,4. In how many of the trials would you end up with $40+ and how many trials do not reach 40$ and eventually will bust putting the tresshold at $-400. Omitting the human factor that tells us when to quite or not, just looking at raw data. Do you see that the total of $40+ trials when accumulated is larger than the total of losses? What does it tell you? I am also interested whether there is a difference for 7/10, 8/10, 9/10 and 10/10. Furthermore I am interested how the winnings are distributed over box 1 (11-20), 2(21-30), 3(31-40). Would you be capable of looking into that? I think that would provide us with some sort of proof right, and moreover first step towards creating some rules. I think for example if we could say that when 9/10 and you have 2/3 hits on 11-15 you should continue betting because the odds are in your favor by x%. What do you think? In the end we cannot predict something that is randomized, however you can try to benefit from certain trends and progression of numbers. Atleast that is what I think
Good luck!Foolwise: that looks really interesting. Do you think you would be able incorporate bankroll progression for all the 1600 trials? Than look at box 2,3,4. In how many of the trials would you end up with $40+ and how many trials do not reach 40$ and eventually will bust putting the tresshold at $-400. Omitting the human factor that tells us when to quite or not, just looking at raw data. Do you see that the total of $40+ trials when accumulated is larger than the total of losses? What does it tell you? I am also interested whether there is a difference for 7/10, 8/10, 9/10 and 10/10. Furthermore I am interested how the winnings are distributed over box 1 (11-20), 2(21-30), 3(31-40). Would you be capable of looking into that? I think that would provide us with some sort of proof right, and moreover first step towards creating some rules. I think for example if we could say that when 9/10 and you have 2/3 hits on 11-15 you should continue betting because the odds are in your favor by x%. What do you think? In the end we cannot predict something that is randomized, however you can try to benefit from certain trends and progression of numbers. Atleast that is what I think