Tamino - Good quote. But there is more to roulette than next spin. JP used to famously say 2 out of 3 games and 3 out of 4 games, never next spin. So unless one sees a set of spins as a set of spins and not look at just the next spin, one might as well leave the game as it will never get them anywhere. Mathematically, there is only one way to beat the roulette and that is through seeing the game with a non-random lens.
+1 Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
I'm surprised I don't see this more often.
How many methods has Ignatus used where he can win 3/4 games.........not necessarily an HG, but surely an odd stroke of "luck".
With larger numbers the variance basically disappears........so why not use a progression of games instead of spins? Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
I would refer to this as a investment strategy to win over time (1000s of spins)........along with diversifying your portfolio with multiple methods at once.
