In this case its not about whether or not their RNG is honest. But I dont think it is, otherwise why not just use a proper RNG certification service?
In this case, it's more about their deception with the "no zero roulette". It is misleading people into thinking they're getting a better chance of winning, when in fact the chances are WORSE.
Also I added this to help:
You need to understand the house edge. It is not complicated math. Here’s an example:
ball-under-cup
Say you are playing the game with three cups, and have to guess where the ball is. You have a 1 in 3 chance of guessing correctly. If you bet $1 on a cup and won, these are FAIR odds and payouts:
1 out of 3 times: You are correct. You get back your wagered amount PLUS TWO dollars.
2 out of 3 times: You are incorrect and lose $1.
So if you played 3 games, you are paid $2 once ($2×1=$2), and lose $1 twice ($1×2=$2). So if you have guesses with 1 in 3 accuracy, then you wont win or lose anything. You’ll just break even.
Now here’s an example of UNFAIR odds and payouts:
1 out of 3 times: You are correct. You get back your wagered amount PLUS ONE dollar.
2 out of 3 times: You are incorrect and lose $1.
Pay close attention to the red text and think about it. The odds of winning haven’t changed. What’s changed is WHEN YOU WIN, YOU ARE PAID AN UNFAIR AMOUNT. And that’s exactly what the “house edge” is. It’s something you really shouldn’t ignore.
And to take it one step further, consider that you can’t change the “payouts” the casino gives you. But you CAN change the “ODDS OF WINNING” with some strategies. For example, card counting can give you a better idea of what card will be dealt next. So you can base bet size on the expectation that you are more likely to win. And roulette computers use physics to predict where the ball will land, with enough accuracy to IMPROVE THE ODDS OF WINNING and therefore get an edge over the casino. These types of strategies are called “advantage play” by casinos specifically because they give the player the “edge”.
Now compare that to most gambling systems, which don’t even give any thought to predicting spin outcomes. Or the method they use doesn’t at all change the “odds”, like expecting after 10 reds in a row will make black more likely to spin next. In fact most roulette system players don’t even bother to test if their method of “bet selection” even changes the odds!
Bringing this all back to Beytvoyager, what they’re doing is like removing one cup, keeping the payouts the same, but then taking a large cut of whatever you win. It’s the same thing as “single zero roulette” where the casino pays you less than what’s fair.
In this case, it's more about their deception with the "no zero roulette". It is misleading people into thinking they're getting a better chance of winning, when in fact the chances are WORSE.
Also I added this to help:
You need to understand the house edge. It is not complicated math. Here’s an example:
ball-under-cup
Say you are playing the game with three cups, and have to guess where the ball is. You have a 1 in 3 chance of guessing correctly. If you bet $1 on a cup and won, these are FAIR odds and payouts:
1 out of 3 times: You are correct. You get back your wagered amount PLUS TWO dollars.
2 out of 3 times: You are incorrect and lose $1.
So if you played 3 games, you are paid $2 once ($2×1=$2), and lose $1 twice ($1×2=$2). So if you have guesses with 1 in 3 accuracy, then you wont win or lose anything. You’ll just break even.
Now here’s an example of UNFAIR odds and payouts:
1 out of 3 times: You are correct. You get back your wagered amount PLUS ONE dollar.
2 out of 3 times: You are incorrect and lose $1.
Pay close attention to the red text and think about it. The odds of winning haven’t changed. What’s changed is WHEN YOU WIN, YOU ARE PAID AN UNFAIR AMOUNT. And that’s exactly what the “house edge” is. It’s something you really shouldn’t ignore.
And to take it one step further, consider that you can’t change the “payouts” the casino gives you. But you CAN change the “ODDS OF WINNING” with some strategies. For example, card counting can give you a better idea of what card will be dealt next. So you can base bet size on the expectation that you are more likely to win. And roulette computers use physics to predict where the ball will land, with enough accuracy to IMPROVE THE ODDS OF WINNING and therefore get an edge over the casino. These types of strategies are called “advantage play” by casinos specifically because they give the player the “edge”.
Now compare that to most gambling systems, which don’t even give any thought to predicting spin outcomes. Or the method they use doesn’t at all change the “odds”, like expecting after 10 reds in a row will make black more likely to spin next. In fact most roulette system players don’t even bother to test if their method of “bet selection” even changes the odds!
Bringing this all back to Beytvoyager, what they’re doing is like removing one cup, keeping the payouts the same, but then taking a large cut of whatever you win. It’s the same thing as “single zero roulette” where the casino pays you less than what’s fair.