Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13676

Re: Betvoyager No Zero Roulette is WORSE than Single Zero Roulette. It's a scam.

$
0
0
I agree that if you're only going to make a few bets, maybe like that guy Ashley Revell  ;D, then you're probably better off sticking with their standard house edge games. But a regular player who can't guarantee that they will win - and who can? then the NZ option is the best.

Again, I have no reason to "promote" Betvoyager. I don't have an account and don't play RNG anyway, but it seems a bit harsh to characterize them as scammers. I was looking at their site and they even have a page about the house edge. How many online casinos give you this kind of information? It's not in their interest to do so; it seems to me that they're more transparent than most.

Regarding the randomness control, it seems that the algorithm is in the public domain, so you could create your own program to compute the checksum. In that case there would be no chance of them being able to cheat. You don't have to rely on their software if you don't trust it.

https://www.betvoyager.com/randomness/#randomness-control-video/
 
Quote
The checksum is being computed with the help of the program used in our casino. Players can use other programs to compute the checksum for text information according to the SHA-256 algorithm. Players can find such programs on the following websites:

    http://jssha.sourceforge.net
    http://www.farfarfar.com/scripts/encrypt
    http://www.fileformat.info/tool/hash.htm
    Additional checksum calculators

The SHA-256 is merely one of numerous algorithms that can be used to compute a checksum. We have chosen it to ensure randomness control in our casino because no modern sources of information have ever uncovered any insecurities or incorrectness connected with this algorithm.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13676

Trending Articles