-Curiosone
As stated in Turners Post #320 I got the additional numbers from random.org and played through as I said I would in my Posts #308 and #319.
Thank you Turner.
Here is the payout sheet with the random.org numbers.Code: [Select]CURIOSONE 14APR16
(NOTE: Spins 30-37 generated by random.org as suggested by Turner)
S # R Bet P Stake Won Net Total
1 4
2 35
3 6
4 5
5 16
6 36
7 14
8 30
9 32
10 25
11 34
12 29
13 33
14 15
15 5 R
16 28 14 1 14 -14 -14
17 23 14 2 28 -28 -42
18 10 14 3 42 -42 -84
19 20 14 4 56 -56 -140
20 27 14 5 70 -70 -210
21 19 -210
22 2 -210
23 24 -210
24 31 -210
25 13 -210
26 4 R -210
27 6 R 23 6 138 216 78 -132
28 16 R 22 5 110 180 70 -62 ------ Quit at first positive profit as stated in Post #319
29 28 R 21 4 84 144 60 -2
30 19 R 20 3 60 108 48 46 --- QUIT
31 1 19 1 19 -19 27
32 7 19 2 38 -38 -11
33 24 R 19 3 57 108 51 40
34 28 18 2 36 -36 4
35 3 18 3 54 -54 -50
36 36 R 18 4 72 144 72 22
37 16 17 3 51 -51 -29
[/note]
Hey Celt
I believe Random.org is perfectly random.
As for those 8, it poses some questions,
If I understand that a random number is just that....a number which doesnt relate in any way to other random numbers...then what was it you were saying "if only I had the last 8" to?
It was 8 random numbers. And any 8 random numbers are just that. And as soon as I say 8 then I am seeing them in series, in a line, which means nothing to the RNG. Only to our abstract mind.
Then you naturally think..."so what was it I was tracking then?"
Its hard to visualise.