Because he has respect for him, and doesnt for others and his heart is ruling his head on this one. Call it a soft spot, kinda like a murderer helping a cat out of a tree just after he wasted his family in the house...but less serious lol
LOL
I think I'm offended but I'm not sure. (climbs higher up the tree to think about it)
Bayes and others have a great point. Basically -
What If I win or someone wins - have they beaten the game ?.
This is roulette and math.. you have to (HAVE TO) ask yourself -
"Can I do the exact same thing that person did (or is doing) and win the same way ?"
No.. not with almost all systems and methods that have been posted (since forever).
Player A could go and win win win win and Player B will lose on the first try and quit using it.
Player C might win and lose and win and eventually lose.
The total of ALL of their play will be the negative house edge - math says so.
Player A can say all day that it's the Holy Grail, Player B can say it "sucks", Player C will argue
that "hey, sometimes it works - sometimes it doesn't, I ended up losing".
So is this any proof ? No, not unless you look at the "BIG PICTURE" - that is where proof comes from -
it eliminates "luck" (which isn't a real thing anyway).
See ? Everyone should stop thinking as one person who may use something and win - giving it credit when another player can't win using the exact same rules.