C'mon General, you're just pulling out the standard template again! Give me some credit! ![;D]( "Grin")
For starters, 1 & 2 are irrelevant to independence/dependence, 3. is true, but your conclusion in 4. doesn't necessarily follow from the fact that the number of pockets remains the same from one spin to the next. Like I said before, there are other ways dependence can arise. Your analysis is too crude.
Also, you're assuming that I'm committing the gambler's fallacy by using past spins as a guide to future spins. I'm not.
You may be right. However, not at the casinos I play at.
And this thread is in danger of wandering off course. I think we should let Priyanka have the floor.
For starters, 1 & 2 are irrelevant to independence/dependence, 3. is true, but your conclusion in 4. doesn't necessarily follow from the fact that the number of pockets remains the same from one spin to the next. Like I said before, there are other ways dependence can arise. Your analysis is too crude.
Also, you're assuming that I'm committing the gambler's fallacy by using past spins as a guide to future spins. I'm not.
Quote
The free mode offered by many of the online casinos/cellphones/games sometimes contain program code that's designed to fool people into believing that they can beat the game.
You may be right. However, not at the casinos I play at.
And this thread is in danger of wandering off course. I think we should let Priyanka have the floor.