the Falkor goes deeper and deeper!!!Yeah, I'm thinking that this edge may still be possible by stitching bets for better payout odds - usually over multi-spin events. However, variance and dispersion seems to get in the way of detecting the edge as they seem to be 2 different forces at work. For example, let's say you got paid 5 chips for every 1 chip you bet on Red, you can still come out negative if dispersion got it's way and you had 10 blacks in a row.
Stitching bets is possibly something new that Priyanka brought to the table that Manrique may not have been aware of?
They say that stats cannot help us overcome dispersion (negative variance). Winkel is said to leave a GUT set when the trot is not performing as it should - this is the same concept as waiting out the losses as per "dispersion killing". Both Priyanka and winkel are trying to work around dispersion using similar techniques of facing the losses and waiting for the winning streak to return.
As a younger generation to Manrique, winkel and Priyanka perhaps my brain can offer something new here that all these great masters have missed?
Don't forget: I already discovered parachute progression independent of any teachings here. I already cracked the other mysteries of life. Can I crack this one? Rather than trying to go with dispersion perhaps we can try to keep one step ahead. The constant here is "change" - but the stats don't stay the same either - so I think we need to rely on the law of the third (that's what we use every time we start a new session), the changing stats, and making our sessions longer (not shorter). In the end I think growing ratios and better stitched payouts will prevail over dispersion. But I could be wrong.