If I had bet during that time I could have won or lost, but I didn't, so I'm on 0.
When I'll return the next day I'm going to continue my method, the same thing regardless what happened while I was absent.
This kind of questions are pointless in my opinion.
Say you have an insider who gives you information, so during his/her shift saw 23 was missing.
How could you exploit such info?
Isn't fallacy?
If not, why?
How are you different from someone who bets black after 10 reds in a row?
I ask these types of questions for "you people". I already know the correct answer. I ask in order to know what you're thinking.
Ken