I think the right question should be:
Can we force a win in a certain situation?
Let the situation be an upcoming crossing.
As to my understanding of the PP we need an event of a certain probability to combine it with the upcoming crossing situation.
Kon-Fu-Sed proofed that betting only on specific crossing has negative expectancy. So the combination with an other event would against the rules of Winkel to bet crossings mean that:
If the event (that has to be defined) is A then we bet for the crossing.
If the event is B then we bet the opposit numbers.
To tell also my oppinion about your question:
No, I don't think we can force a crossing in a specific situation.
R.
Can we force a win in a certain situation?
Let the situation be an upcoming crossing.
As to my understanding of the PP we need an event of a certain probability to combine it with the upcoming crossing situation.
Kon-Fu-Sed proofed that betting only on specific crossing has negative expectancy. So the combination with an other event would against the rules of Winkel to bet crossings mean that:
If the event (that has to be defined) is A then we bet for the crossing.
If the event is B then we bet the opposit numbers.
To tell also my oppinion about your question:
No, I don't think we can force a crossing in a specific situation.
R.