Quote
That "longer" could be the rest of my lifeTurner
But you cannot declare with certainty that every method would last as long as your method, not only because of different results, but also because not all methods have the same exposure.
In terms of exposure to house edge, betting only one number is the best, thus could keep you in the game longer, am I right?
But try to look the same bet in a different way, a dealer, not necessarily skillful, could fairly easily dodge a specific number/pocket for veeeery long time, in that case you'd broke before you know it.
Where is the longer now?!
If all numbers have same chance at any given time then why some of them hit more than average, while others appear less than average?
It's fact and not a theory, biased wheels is not the answer because we encounter the same phenomenon more less to all wheels.
Yes, I do have the answer...there is a universal bias it's being called ''law of thirds''.
It's useless if you cannot comprehend why this always happens , on every wheel, with every croupier, even with RNG's and mixed results from different days and/or casinos.
It's the only universal fact, disregard it and you'll be looking for wheels' biases and dealers' signatures, searching from one wheel/dealer to the next, from one casino to the next...
Wasting plenty of time by gathering thousands of results before you place a single bet, just eventually to find out that the particular wheel has been replaced or leveled, your favorite croupier has been replaced or no longer spins predictable patterns because their employers instructed him/her to spin with different power from spin to spin (softer/harder)...
Personally I don't want to spend so much time just to know if this is good or not for betting.
Besides by using all those previous spins ain't that what you preach as fallacy?!
So why you think when you are using previous spins it's not fallacy but when someone else is using them it is?
Don't you know that dealers are spinning differently from spin to spin thus the slightest of differences produces different outcomes, therefore your wheel's and/or dealer's profile is rendered obsolete from one spin to the next, let alone from one day to the next!
Oh how nice to find that a wheel produces 3 pockets more than average and to expect that the exact same pockets will continue approximately with the same frequency of hits for a month, 6 months, a year, forever!
Does this sounds realistic to you?!
Roulette devices are not exception because they are as good as the method(s) installed, so if a method is fallacious those roulette devices would produce automated fallacies.
When a profile based on past outcomes/measurements becomes obsolete because the conditions have changed it's nothing more than a fallacy.
If you can say that past outcomes can't determine future ones, then I could say with equal certainty that past measurements/performance can't determine future ones!
If a wheel and/or dealer produces predictable patterns, the casinos are the first to know it because they have staff which looks for such things 24/7 and takes any necessary measures against these rare incidents.
So don't fool yourselves that you know better the casinos' property than the casinos! Don't you dare to condemn the rest who decided to follow a different approach because you are no better!