No no I understand everything you said. No worries.
![:)]( "Smiley")
↧
Re: Steve's computers
↧
Re: Steve's computers
Maybe you missed what I said. I didnt cheat anyone. Anyone who listened to my advice would have profited.
I will say the truth and accept any consequence of honesty. if the truth meant I was wrong, Ill accept that, learn, and become a better person. I would be ashamed of lying about anything, because lying is hiding from who you really are. I dont hide. I can look myself in the mirror and see an honest person. The attacks against my "products" are not what bother me so much. They are not mere products. They are the result of decades of work. What annoys me is more the lies about me and who I am, by clowns without integrity. Kav is just another of them. And the ignorance of people who are too stupid to think for themselves.
I never judge people or anything on what others have said or rumors floating around. I make my own mind up and take people on face value and you seem a cool guy to me....apart from the alien stuff.
Thats just fckin mental.
↧
↧
Re: Rolletti's Session Flashlights for denzie
↧
Re: few quick vids for R.N.G fans to ponder on LIVE play
another small session getting closer and closer , ![:)]( "Smiley")
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4sce6iX8-czajlyZXVkUk9SQ1U/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4sce6iX8-czajlyZXVkUk9SQ1U/view?usp=sharing
↧
Re: Rolletti's Session Flashlights for denzie
Rolletti as you observe a trot what is the longest you have seen the 11th non-hit take to come in, would it be say 3 spins or 6 spins,maybe 9 spins?
Do you mean something like that?
11th unhit at e.g. spin 19?
It's rear but I saw it already at least one time.
↧
↧
Re: Rolletti's Session Flashlights for denzie
A slow trott session.Thanks!
Did not get a fast one. Will post when I get one.
Interesting to see how you do it.
- Tuddilue
↧
Re: Steve's computers
It is a saddening that all stars have a life span
Global warming is a moot point
In a few million years the sun will advance to its next stage and the earth will be too hot to live on
We must leave to survive
Global warming is a moot point
In a few million years the sun will advance to its next stage and the earth will be too hot to live on
We must leave to survive
↧
Re: Dig-A-Doz
I hope that my memory is not deceiving me but I remember a progression for single dozens with 65 steps. Like a ladder you moved up and down but not necessarily in steps of one. Move up when you lose, move down and by how much when you win. Anyone remember this? Was it any use?
↧
Re: Dig-A-Doz
i sorta remember that 65 step single dozen would love it if someone had it available
↧
↧
Re: Dig-A-Doz
i sorta remember that 65 step single dozen would love it if someone had it available
http://www.gamblersglen.com/cgi-bin/teemz/teemz.cgi?board=_master&action=opentopic&topic=197&forum=Roulette_Archive_2005
That?
↧
Re: Rolletti's Session Flashlights for denzie
As GUT is not a mechanical system there area lot of psychological facts involved and make sometimes the difference between winning and losing.
Do I really play according to what I see? Or do I place the bets where I just "think" the next hit will be?
To be not "sure" about a bet may be based on the contradicting facts of the trott or simply on a bad feeling caused by the dissonance between conlusion of logic and thoughts or believes about what should happen next.
The better someone is able to see and analyse the facts and also act according to them the better are the results of the game play.
This is exactly what I am telling and praying since 2006. It´s my original explanation. And it was damned, because there are no ironclad rules but psychological parts in it.
And as long as you use my phrases, my way of tracking, my idea of crossings, my ideas of "watch what is going on" you play MY STRATEGY. KTF and WTF are only found because of my explanations, statistic work and developments. If there hadn´t been 0s; 1s; >1s and the trot-design, there hadn´t been that two ways.
These two ways are only a part of my mentioned "extended way of playing GUT". It had been played in the German forum "DC-Campus" and Numbers were given by "AlbertM". Unfortunately this Forum is down and I can´t give the link to that.
And therefore there is not even the right of the thief to complain about my comments.
BTW they have been not in this thread.
↧
Re: Rolletti's Session Flashlights for denzie
Are you calling me a thief because I play 0x, 1x, and 2x?
↧
Re: Steve's computers
Ok now I'm 100% sure. Kav is an idiot. Yup. That guy is so fake you can smell it from miles away. He doesn't even try hard anymore. ![:lol:]( "LoL")
And the award for schizophrenia goes to......drumroll. ....... KAV
![:thumbsup:]( "Thumbs-up")
And the award for schizophrenia goes to......drumroll. ....... KAV
↧
↧
Re: Rolletti's Session Flashlights for denzie
Quote from: winkel on Today at 06:25:45 PM
But it will (for sure) be used to "confirm" that GUT doesn´t work! I know these kind of efforts.
And by the way you are wrong. Actually I'm promoting GUT as I'm a winner with it.
But it will (for sure) be used to "confirm" that GUT doesn´t work! I know these kind of efforts.
And by the way you are wrong. Actually I'm promoting GUT as I'm a winner with it.
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
I'm unable to find her quote but that might be sacrilege? I'm sure it was Priyanka who said that we must look at the events, which are not equally likely, instead of individual spins?
Why not take a closer look?
↧
Re: HI-Jack
Have done his manually so there's always chance of error but if I've done it right (who knows ![:xd:]( "XD")
) by using the numbers taken from here
http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17235.msg160156;topicseen#msg160156
And playing the way as described in the original first post EXCEPT playing repeat numbers, I have interesting results. I didn't count up ££, just what I'd consider a win or loss. A win would be a ball on a number, a loss on a street (so a win could be from 2u bet to a total of 30u spent in bets overall - so profit range of 6u - 34u per win)
Loss of land on a street I think was 6u (or was it 12u?!)
17 wins
7 losses
) by using the numbers taken from here http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17235.msg160156;topicseen#msg160156
And playing the way as described in the original first post EXCEPT playing repeat numbers, I have interesting results. I didn't count up ££, just what I'd consider a win or loss. A win would be a ball on a number, a loss on a street (so a win could be from 2u bet to a total of 30u spent in bets overall - so profit range of 6u - 34u per win)
Loss of land on a street I think was 6u (or was it 12u?!)
17 wins
7 losses
↧
Re: HI-Jack
Thanks for testing Redherring ![:)]( "Smiley")
↧
↧
Re: HI-Jack
No problem. Re-reading what I wrote, my maths are shocking. But it still stands won more than lost ![:twisted:]( "Twisted")
↧
Re: European Championship
The end ! To much room for Wales. Best team won.
They should beat Portugal as well.....
They should beat Portugal as well.....
↧
Re: European Championship
The end ! To much room for Wales. Best team won.
They should beat Portugal as well.....
From your lips to God's Ears!!!
↧