slow first half ![:yawn:]( "yawn")
↧
Re: European Championship
↧
Re: European Championship
They both scared . But Wales was lucky....could be penalty on Ronaldo!
↧
↧
Re: Winning System *I think*
Evening all,
Right...950 spins tested tonight
Autowheel jackpot247.com (20 hours of play)
Profit: £235.00
Two first round losers, but followed by the a second/third round winner.
😁😁😁
Right...950 spins tested tonight
Autowheel jackpot247.com (20 hours of play)
Profit: £235.00
Two first round losers, but followed by the a second/third round winner.
😁😁😁
↧
Re: follow the split flow
and the flow keeps going ![:twisted:]( "Twisted")
500eu + playing 10cents and 20 cents![:love:]( "Love")
500eu + playing 10cents and 20 cents
↧
Re: Win Bet
↧
↧
Re: European Championship
Geez wrong again. I would say Portugal as champion but since I'm wrong to many times...... France ? ? ? ?
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
Priyanka said that each cycle length event has constant odds, but this is somewhat misleading, as we can manipulate those odds by entering the game at a "tipping point"?
Here I reset Cycle Lengths (temporary) whenever Same is greater than Different or CL2 is greater than the rest.
Cycle Lengths (normal) is what the cycle lengths would have been if not constantly being reset.
Another snapshot of these stats, Cycle Lengths (biased), is taken when (CL3 - CL2 > 5).
![]()
So if we wait for CL3 to go ahead by 6 then we can convert CL2 odds from 37% to 41%. And I'm sure this can be improved upon after figuring out the best tipping point and optimum time to reset the stats. This is just a very preliminary test to demonstrate that the odds - within this cyclic framework of constant ratios - are not necessarily fixed.
However, Priyanka doesn't seem to use any cycle length tipping point for knowing when to switch to a bet on CL3. It's possible that she alternates from CL 2 > CL 3 > CL 2 > CL3... the reason? There is a 70 odd % chance that the next cycle length will be different to the previous; perhaps we can rely on this basic stat to guide us with entry into CL3? (I certainly haven't found any other genuine trigger yet except waiting for the aforementioned tipping point)
Here I reset Cycle Lengths (temporary) whenever Same is greater than Different or CL2 is greater than the rest.
Cycle Lengths (normal) is what the cycle lengths would have been if not constantly being reset.
Another snapshot of these stats, Cycle Lengths (biased), is taken when (CL3 - CL2 > 5).
So if we wait for CL3 to go ahead by 6 then we can convert CL2 odds from 37% to 41%. And I'm sure this can be improved upon after figuring out the best tipping point and optimum time to reset the stats. This is just a very preliminary test to demonstrate that the odds - within this cyclic framework of constant ratios - are not necessarily fixed.
However, Priyanka doesn't seem to use any cycle length tipping point for knowing when to switch to a bet on CL3. It's possible that she alternates from CL 2 > CL 3 > CL 2 > CL3... the reason? There is a 70 odd % chance that the next cycle length will be different to the previous; perhaps we can rely on this basic stat to guide us with entry into CL3? (I certainly haven't found any other genuine trigger yet except waiting for the aforementioned tipping point)
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
BTW, to get to those normal Cycle Length percentages only takes about 500 cycles max - tested and confirmed:
Cycle Lengths (normal): 1068 (24.51%) 1620 (37.17%) 1248 (28.64%) 422 (9.68%)
From then on it remains at the same percentages as per Priyanka's comparison between 500,1000,2000 cycles.
Cycle Lengths (normal): 1068 (24.51%) 1620 (37.17%) 1248 (28.64%) 422 (9.68%)
From then on it remains at the same percentages as per Priyanka's comparison between 500,1000,2000 cycles.
↧
Re: Your roulette system search is over...
You will get the same distribution of non hits with either rng or real spins. But you can only beat real spins, and it's not with statistics. You cannot beat roulette with statistics.
Knowing the number of pockets and basic average amount of occurrences tells you nothing useful about the next spin. Nothing that changes the odds. Any proper testing proves it.
Knowing the number of pockets and basic average amount of occurrences tells you nothing useful about the next spin. Nothing that changes the odds. Any proper testing proves it.
↧
↧
Re: Your roulette system search is over...
You will get the same distribution of non hits with either rng or real spins. But you can only beat real spins, and it's not with statistics. You cannot beat roulette with statistics.
Knowing the number of pockets and basic average amount of occurrences tells you nothing useful about the next spin. Nothing that changes the odds. Any proper testing proves it.
So....of course you can decline to answer, but does TG have a winning maths method that has an edge, not involving AP.
↧
Re: LAWS OF LOGIC (LOL)
Or use my "20 Groups Tracker / Clicker", the free version can record 5 bet selections and you only need 4 for this.
Thanks
↧
Re: LAWS OF LOGIC (LOL)
4/5 Games won
↧
Re: LAWS OF LOGIC (LOL)
4/6 Games won
Perhaps this strategy wasn't such a good idea :S![:-\]( "Undecided")
Perhaps this strategy wasn't such a good idea :S
↧
↧
Re: Winning System *I think*
Evening all,
Today 350 spins (live autowheel)
Should have had 1000 spins but video crash...grrrr!!
7.5 hours of play!
Profit = £50.00
Again two 1st round loser....both won on the second/third rounds.
Going to be away...soo will not update after tomorrow.
Today 350 spins (live autowheel)
Should have had 1000 spins but video crash...grrrr!!
7.5 hours of play!
Profit = £50.00
Again two 1st round loser....both won on the second/third rounds.
Going to be away...soo will not update after tomorrow.
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
RESULTS ARE IN !!!!!!!!!!!!!
And what an AMAZING result it is: RogerFederer More takes victory in the outer court to win this year's Roulette championship against next year's champion, Van der Waerden, at an uncontested 4 sets to nil: 56, 31, 11, and 2 !!!!!!!
![]()
Let's hear it for them, folks: BIG IT UP for Roger and the people's coach: Priyanka - sponsored by Edge Cycles!!!!!!!!!
![]()
Defined by Same = 65%!!!!
![]()
And what an AMAZING result it is: Roger
Let's hear it for them, folks: BIG IT UP for Roger and the people's coach: Priyanka - sponsored by Edge Cycles!!!!!!!!!
Defined by Same = 65%!!!!
↧
Re: Steve's computers
We need a rolling eyes emoj asap ![:lol:]( "LoL")
↧
Re: complaintttt
Steve,
Clearly something must be wrong with the multiplayer game. After all, none of the countless systems posted by the system junkies on this board appear to be working. Grass Roots, the KTF, and Winkel's Law Of The Third all appear to be losing. Oh my.![::)]( "Roll Eyes")
![]()
Clearly something must be wrong with the multiplayer game. After all, none of the countless systems posted by the system junkies on this board appear to be working. Grass Roots, the KTF, and Winkel's Law Of The Third all appear to be losing. Oh my.
↧
↧
Re: complaintttt
It's a conspiracy. The software avoids any bets. I'll turn everyone to the dark side and rule the galaxy.
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
Sarcasm?
No, satire. It's going to be an amazingly yuge test and i hope people will be nice to me in the meantime.
↧
Re: complaintttt
lol..nice one..so i understand that is ok for bots to play and not use ready..thank you
p.s yes non of the systems work they are all crap...RIP
p.s yes non of the systems work they are all crap...RIP
↧