Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all 13528 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Anyone?

$
0
0
Pri,

I hope you're not secretly soliciting for money/investors via PMs like XXVV does on the other forum .

Re: Anyone?

$
0
0
Pri.

Do yourself a favor and ignore him

You never misled anyone or tried to sell anything

You talked about cycles and different ways to view the game

You got people thinking

You had a major discussion which is what a forum is for.

You used the forum for which it is designed.

He does not

This homunculus sets the forum back.

Noone argues AP doesnt work. It does. But thats besides the point, he sucks. Its about him personally, not AP

Ignore him please

He is not worth the cyber space the post takes up in regards to forum productivity

Let it slide

Re: Anyone?

$
0
0
Pri,

It appears as though Ghost will be your first customer.  No surprise there.   ::)

Re: Anyone?

$
0
0
If it wasn't for google images.....

And copy and paste

Re: Anyone?

$
0
0
Pri,

I hope you're not secretly soliciting for money/investors via PMs like XXVV does on the other forum .
LOl.  God has been kind to me. For some people there are only two ways to success. Shortcut. And shorter shortcut.

My main source of income is through another profession that I enjoy in the gaming industry(note not gambling industry) and am happy with what I get. I don't have to be lingering in a forum for years to draw pennies from poor souls who lurk here for fortune.

Re: Random Thoughts - A concise reference (version 3)

$
0
0
WOW, this is your BOOK!

Thanks man, but save it to read later, very very long lol!

Re: Random Thoughts

$
0
0
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GwnvTTEC00o
Yeah, I saw that, but don't really know how it fits into all this. What is being demonstrated here - or does it have any relevance to what's been discussed previously?

I've been having great difficulty evaluating ratios and payout odds together for events that are 2 spins or more. For 1 spin it's easy:

Spin 2 - CL1
# Quads BetStreets Payout# Streets Bet# Units per StreetWinLoseWin Ratio (%)Win RatioLose Ratio (%)Lose RatioWin TotalLose TotalTotal Profit/Loss
111319-3250.25750.752.25-2.250
Spin 3 - CL2
# Quads BetStreets Payout# Streets Bet# Units per StreetWinLoseWin Ratio (%)Win RatioLose Ratio (%)Lose RatioWin TotalLose TotalTotal Profit/Loss
211616-6500.5500.53-30
Spin 4 - CL3
# Quads BetStreets Payout# Streets Bet# Units per StreetWinLoseWin Ratio (%)Win RatioLose Ratio (%)Lose RatioWin TotalLose TotalTotal Profit/Loss
311913-9750.75250.252.25-2.250

For other multi-spin events I am going to have to use the simulator - but what seems clear with cycles is that stitching bets is not profitable here; Priyanka did once state that stitching bets doesn't always work in our favor, so flat-betting will be the order of the day.

Do spin 3 or spin 2 events have better profit/loss results compared to single spin events? TBC...

Re: Hello, everybody! I'm Praline.

$
0
0
Actually we know what would be a release number +\- 3. New spin always starts from last pocket


Actually, not everywhere.  For example, in the US they do not even attempt to release from the last number because the wheel spins the same direction on each spin.

Watching to see where the ball is released isn't very efficient.  It's more effective to let the ball make a few revs and then view the number below it at some specific location on the bowl.

Re: Randomer Thoughts

$
0
0
Can't post in random thoughts so I post HERE.


Dear , Falkor.
You are doing  a great  job but I Think it's a run in a wrong way. Try to reread first six pages of random thoughts.  Rrbb mentioned that answer is there. We must find the way to combine vdw with (for example)  Pigeon hole principle. BUT PHP can work also for cycle lengths and those are not equally likely like dozens. I will ask you to do the same CODING WORK that you've done but with vdw on Cycle lengths. I don't say I am right, but I'm trying :P

Re: Did Priyanka cheat on Steve's multiplayer game?

Re: Can there be a truce on this forum?

$
0
0
I really like bet selection

Why they give him a platform is beyond me



Now that's beyond me too. Why they allow him ? And on another note... De dude is a lawyer....so he probably knows what can and can't. But isn't it illegal to scam ? I mean let's say I buy it. And well surprise it doesn't work. Can I sue him ?

Re: Can there be a truce on this forum?

$
0
0
"Mentoring" fees

What a joke

Mentor this :
....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(
..............\.............\...

Re: Can there be a truce on this forum?

$
0
0
Why they give him a platform is beyond me

He is supported by a few people he has misled, and they're not experienced enough to see he's full of it. Its quite sad to see how easily people are misled. When you ban a member, even if its clearly for the good, admin is bound to be attacked. I dont think Victor wants any heat, whether or not he sees though alabalah. I tolerated alabalah for a while, until the stench of bs became too much. Almost everyone supported me banning him, except a few who accused me of censoring his hg to protect my "scam", as if he would ruin me with a martingale variation. Ive said many times if sales were more important to me than truth and facts, Id run an uncensored forum and let controversy and arguments go wild. Ever notice the conflict threats get far more hits?

When I took over the forums, I wouldnt tolerate people like alabalah. And I would try and educate people about what really worked. And as is common, most people didnt want to listen. Members left and accused me of hiding HGs to sell my products. Like telling the truth was a conspiracy.

The fact is if I never tried to help people understand AP for free, the ignorance would be worse, there would be more posts, more traffic, and more sales. The sales mostly come from google traffic, not members because there may be just 20 productive forum members at one time, but hundreds of new visitors from google every day. Ultimately if telling the truth means a quieter forum, so be it. Id rather tell the truth and try to help people than shut up and profit more.

If you say me going on about AP this and that to members profits me, actually its better for me to shut up as explained above. My point is I care mych more about the truth than maximizing sales. So naturally when people say ai have forums just for business, it gets under my skin because its not the truth.

Anyway I know you're not an AP guy, Really Im fine with that. I just want you to understand me better and that tbe forums are not just business.

ps, no government would bother prosecuting small time scammers.

Re: Can there be a truce on this forum?

$
0
0
rg he knows you wouldnt pay him anything (i sure hope you wouldnt). Thats why he's pretending to not want your money.

Re: Can there be a truce on this forum?

$
0
0
Ive bought books

But we are talking a few dollars

Never systems

Re: Random Thoughts

$
0
0
So nobody has anything to say about this then???  :question: I thought this might be a key time for Priyanka (or one of the few who knows what works) to "throw a bone"? You wise, intelligent, ones disappoint me sometimes. What would Manrique do - help a student in need or give the silent treatment?

Could the above be a case of Dispersion? And does this have anything to do with Pryanka's recent "see-saw" video and/or Dimsun's "The Perfect Loser"?

"Dispersion

What is it??
 
Is when something start to happend less than the expected.

how that affect me?
 
At some point , no matter what you do , you will experiment , this moments on gambling , moments when whatever you are betting is coming less than the expected , when that happened you will start to lose.
 
Can i dodge the dispersion? I mean I can escape from it?
 
No you can't , no matter what you do , you can change the table , comeback tomorrow , next year , change the ball , change the dealer , change the roulette , play at rgn or online or on the table again , and she will follow you.

What? ???
 
Yes

One moment! then I will fight the dispersion there is many systems out there that can win using progressions , increasing the amount of chips after some loses , to make up for those periods , where there is dispersion....
Is not that bad that dispersion.

 
Actually they can tame the dispersion , but only for a little while , she always end up , being stronger than any system like that , there is even persons that call themselves professionals because they are taming the dispersion using models like that. they can last years winning and then in a few months lose all the winnings and their total bankroll.
 
I can't belive that! , but dispersion has to have a limit so we can control her.
 
No she has no limits , no matter how big is the amount the dispersion you saw , you can always see it bigger.

Then ?
 
Then we have to wait for him.

Who ?
 
Her opposition.

GGasoft"
source: http://betselection.cc/gambling-philosophy/dispersion-killing/msg14338/#msg14338

Is Priyanka's use of virtual wins/losses in the old Quads video analysed by RayManZ an application of VdW or Dispersion killing?

Re: Random Thoughts

$
0
0
"At the moment, I go virtual if I don't get a hit within a cycle, then re-enter after a virtual hit, using a mild progression. If miss 3 cycles, I'll still wait for another virtual hit before re-entering, but will now bet the very minimum until I get 3 hits that meet with the statistical expectations of the bet selection I am placing. After this, I'll return to my mild progression (using Lanky's divisor), but will be ready to repeat the above process if the hits don't come (or even quit for the day)."
source: http://www.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=3428.5

Re: Random Thoughts

$
0
0
the Falkor goes deeper and deeper!!!

Re: Random Thoughts

$
0
0
the Falkor goes deeper and deeper!!!
Yeah, I'm thinking that this edge may still be possible by stitching bets for better payout odds - usually over multi-spin events. However, variance and dispersion seems to get in the way of detecting the edge as they seem to be 2 different forces at work. For example, let's say you got paid 5 chips for every 1 chip you bet on Red, you can still come out negative if dispersion got it's way and you had 10 blacks in a row.

Stitching bets is possibly something new that Priyanka brought to the table that Manrique may not have been aware of?

They say that stats cannot help us overcome dispersion (negative variance). Winkel is said to leave a GUT set when the trot is not performing as it should - this is the same concept as waiting out the losses as per "dispersion killing". Both Priyanka and winkel are trying to work around dispersion using similar techniques of facing the losses and waiting for the winning streak to return.

As a younger generation to Manrique, winkel and Priyanka perhaps my brain can offer something new here that all these great masters have missed?  :wink: Don't forget: I already discovered parachute progression independent of any teachings here. I already cracked the other mysteries of life. Can I crack this one? Rather than trying to go with dispersion perhaps we can try to keep one step ahead. The constant here is "change" - but the stats don't stay the same either - so I think we need to rely on the law of the third (that's what we use every time we start a new session), the changing stats, and making our sessions longer (not shorter). In the end I think growing ratios and better stitched payouts will prevail over dispersion. But I could be wrong.

Re: Random Thoughts

Viewing all 13528 articles
Browse latest View live