Yeah WG good man
↧
Re: Where art The Mighty Wally Gator?
↧
Re: Winning System *I think*
Denzie have you looked at average document, just look at 25th gone looks ok
↧
↧
Re: Where art The Mighty Wally Gator?
WG and Celtic been seen cleaning out the casino's safe
↧
Re: Hot & Cold Shower
What some will do (not saying he does this, not saying he doesn't).....a person posts THE principles ![;)]( "Wink")
of a decent method. Not really to tease but perhaps laying the "ground work". Its a FORM of contributing to the board. Lets make sure to separate the scammers that might have something for sale vs. the person THAT REALLY KNOWS his s**t, nothing for sale.
The "better" version(s) are kept to the author which I agree with 100%, I get it.
Ken
of a decent method. Not really to tease but perhaps laying the "ground work". Its a FORM of contributing to the board. Lets make sure to separate the scammers that might have something for sale vs. the person THAT REALLY KNOWS his s**t, nothing for sale.The "better" version(s) are kept to the author which I agree with 100%, I get it.
Ken
↧
Re: Hot & Cold Shower
What some will do (not saying he does this, not saying he doesn't).....a person posts THE principlesof a decent method. Not really to tease but perhaps laying the "ground work". Its a FORM of contributing to the board. Lets make sure to separate the scammers that might have something for sale vs. the person THAT REALLY KNOWS his s**t, nothing for sale.
The "better" version(s) are kept to the author which I agree with 100%, I get it.
Ken
I completely agree with you!
↧
↧
Re: game not working
the clock stops on 1 second 23#'s covered clock clicks over, lost. Again relay and chip up to 5 units, yeah clock stops and lose again
↧
name does not show
why my nick does not show on roulette game....i know i am shity player but not that much
Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17414.0
Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17414.0
↧
Re: Is it a stupid way to bet
just left multi player won with watching 0x,1x+>1x's, plus winning method*i think*.
Looked at the spins and goes full 37 cycle, would now chip up to 2 units on #1, yeah in it comes.![:twisted:]( "Twisted")
Mad or what
Looked at the spins and goes full 37 cycle, would now chip up to 2 units on #1, yeah in it comes.
Mad or what
↧
Re: Where it all started
I started with Trioplay... anyone remember that?
Doesn't ring a bell. ... explain pls
↧
↧
Re: Randomer Thoughts
Well done! I see the pattern with the last 2 dominant dozens - I may need to test again. You seemed to retrack at the beginning a couple of times after a loss - but then you stopped? Does retracking make any difference? Is it something to do with dispersion killing (or being the perfect winner instead of the perfect loser)?
Thanks. The Cycle marks don´t necessarily mean a win. They just define the current dominant dozen. After a loss, you retrack by waiting for the next dominant before placing the actual bet.
So:
12
03 K
27
09 K
24
31
34 K - for the next spin, we will bet dz 1 and 3
24 Lost - retrack
01
13 K - for the next spin, we will bet dz 2 and dz 3
01 Lost - retrack
01 K - for the next spin, bet dz 1 and dz 2
22 Win - keep on betting dz 1 and 2 until a loss.
We stop betting after a loss to avoid the clustering of losses. It´s absurd, but with these particular bets, within the cycles and all that, it seems to work.
↧
Re: Boner
im still doing some tests -but not many (busy at work)
↧
Re: Rolletti's Session Flashlights for denzie
This is a slow trott that I had difficulty in playing. I'm interesting to see what your opinion is about it?
40 spins RNG Bwin 20160723
17
18
14
21
36
28
21
27
30
35
27
33
21
18
9
25
10
6
14
14
9
30
26
27
4
31
18
10
14
7
18
13
1
22
35
9
23
29
14
20
Thanks
-Tuddilue
Must have missed this, with Priyankas tracker, bail out with the 1 unit
Code: [Select]
Spin No. Spin Repeat? Non-hit count Progression Result Bank
1 17 37
2 18 36
3 14 35
4 21 34
5 36 33
6 28 32
7 21 R 31
8 27 31
9 30 30
10 35 29
11 27 R 28 1 -28 -28
12 33 28 2 16 -12
13 21 R 27 1 -27 -39
14 18 R 27 2 -54 -93
15 9 27 3 27 -66
16 25 26 2 20 -46
17 10 25 1 11 -35
18 6 24 1 12 -23
19 14 R 23 1 -23 -46
20 14 R 23 2 -46 -92
21 9 R 23 3 -69 -161
22 30 R 23 4 -92 -253
23 26 23 5 65 -188
24 27 R 22 4 -88 -276
25 4 22 5 70 -206
26 31 21 4 60 -146
27 18 R 20 3 -60 -206
28 10 R 20 4 -80 -286
29 14 R 20 5 -100 -386
30 7 20 6 96 -290
31 18 R 19 5 -95 -385
32 13 19 6 102 -283
33 1 18 5 90 -193
34 22 17 4 76 -117
35 35 R 16 3 -48 -165
36 9 R 16 4 -64 -229
37 23 16 5 100 -129
38 29 15 4 84 -45
39 14 R 14 3 -42 -87
40 20 14 4 88 1
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
↧
Re: Yet another system recipe
is it something like that...
↧
↧
Re: Rolletti's Session Flashlights for denzie
Sorry for late reply, I did not look in here for a while.No problem answer when you can.
Had a look at the trot and it was not easy for me to play either.
Find attached my game.
Yes a hard trott. I think the 7 RX was really extreme. It should be around 3 RX.
Interesting to see that you also bet the 2x.
Thanks for the analysis!
- Tuddilue
↧
Re: Rolletti's Session Flashlights for denzie
Must have missed this, with Priyankas tracker, bail out with the 1 unitYes notto. This trott is strange but I think the averages is not so extreme.Code: [Select]Spin No. Spin Repeat? Non-hit count Progression Result Bank
1 17 37
2 18 36
3 14 35
4 21 34
5 36 33
6 28 32
7 21 R 31
8 27 31
9 30 30
10 35 29
11 27 R 28 1 -28 -28
12 33 28 2 16 -12
13 21 R 27 1 -27 -39
14 18 R 27 2 -54 -93
15 9 27 3 27 -66
16 25 26 2 20 -46
17 10 25 1 11 -35
18 6 24 1 12 -23
19 14 R 23 1 -23 -46
20 14 R 23 2 -46 -92
21 9 R 23 3 -69 -161
22 30 R 23 4 -92 -253
23 26 23 5 65 -188
24 27 R 22 4 -88 -276
25 4 22 5 70 -206
26 31 21 4 60 -146
27 18 R 20 3 -60 -206
28 10 R 20 4 -80 -286
29 14 R 20 5 -100 -386
30 7 20 6 96 -290
31 18 R 19 5 -95 -385
32 13 19 6 102 -283
33 1 18 5 90 -193
34 22 17 4 76 -117
35 35 R 16 3 -48 -165
36 9 R 16 4 -64 -229
37 23 16 5 100 -129
38 29 15 4 84 -45
39 14 R 14 3 -42 -87
40 20 14 4 88 1
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
9/10
5+-0
4-1
6+1
Obviously a slow trott but the averages is alright...
- Tuddilue
↧
Re: Should Priyanka write and publish a book on Roulette?
Steve, have you got the raw log for us to analyse?
Yes but it's not appropriate for me to share logs for any players. I've already explained what the logs contain.
How do you explain all the efforts Priyanka has put into the Random Thoughts topics?
It's not uncommon for people to spend time on approaches that dont work.
Do you suspect she is testing with a biased simulator that had a bug in it causing her to win big; she then followed up on BV and happened to get lucky on that too whilst recording the video?
I dont k now what video you are referring to, but I suspect it was short term play. Anyone can show great results in short term.
Could that be why she came here to explain the principles behind her victories? Or do you suspect something more sinister in terms of cheating and rehearsing her winning BV videos; or could she just be outright delusional but good as a hacker?
There have been many members on forums that dont really have anything of value, but like attention. Maybe he's like that. Maybe he's just really trying to contribute, who knows. I'm just saying the facts as they are.
He didn't exactly hack anything. All thats needed is a program like Wireshark to see data your pc sends and receives, and then send different data from your pc to the server. It would take an average programmer a few minutes to figure out.
You are your own person, but I just suggest dont believe everything, and maintain healthy skepticism and an inquisitive mind. Not questioning and not fully thinking things through is likely to waste your time.
↧
Re: Should Priyanka write and publish a book on Roulette?
Here's the bottom line - if someone proves the game can be beat by math alone then Steve's 'work' is no longer needed. So, why wouldn't he bash it all?
Actually if someone found a method better than what I already had, I'd be using it. If there was a "holy grail", I'd use it myself, and integrate it into secure software to allow others to use it either for fee or "pay as you go". That's exactly what I do with my currently best method.
I would love to stay and chat with you guys but I just can't be a part of promoting this guys 'work'.
Okay. Good luck with the martingale
I'm against it, so it must work. Yes its best not to promote the only approaches ever to concern casinos. ps, I didnt invent this universe or physics. It was just there. Some people understand it, some dont.↧
↧
Re: Hello, everybody! I'm Praline.
Praline,
Online play is a hapless venture. You have to be lucky in order to win, and you need luck to actually get paid.
Correct post, I agree 100%.
Ken
↧
Re: Should Priyanka write and publish a book on Roulette?
3Nine, Steve is just trying to protect his fellow citizens and warn us about potential scams as he sees it - particularly those members who frequent this forum, i.e. on his own turf. Shame Steve can't share the log file as that's what would be needed in a court of law to convict Priyanka. I guess it must be due to the data protection act or some such?
![:thumbsup:]( "Thumbs-up")
Quote
You are your own person, but I just suggest dont believe everything, and maintain healthy skepticism and an inquisitive mind. Not questioning and not fully thinking things through is likely to waste your time.Well said!
Quote
Good luck finding the "proof" - it's all there, Falkor.I'm still testing - thanks! I realised from the beginning it could all be a waste of time as per potential red flags duly noted by Steve, but I am happy to proceed as I find it a fascinating subject - and it keeps the brain stimulated (not many things can). I must have tried and failed with scores of systems before I began following Priyanka. It's a big sacrifice - but I find it beneficial all the same. Its not the money - it's the paradoxical nature of the game that keeps me interested.
↧
Re: Should Priyanka write and publish a book on Roulette?
So... Steve's investigation into Priyanka has finished and his findings are damning to say the least. However, my investigation still continues... she deserves a fair trial. Currently, I am following up on one of her official statements:
"If our selection process does not result in a random sequence but instead on a predictable pattern will these stats and distribution hold good."
This one, alone, deserves a separate trial I think!!!![8)]( "Cool")
"If our selection process does not result in a random sequence but instead on a predictable pattern will these stats and distribution hold good."
This one, alone, deserves a separate trial I think!!!
↧