No if you check my blog all the updates are about hybrid software. The programmer working on those are the priority for now. The required mods for the trial will definitely be done but the priority work needs to be done first. I cant easily estimate when because I dont control the programmer's schedule.
↧
Re: Steve's computers
↧
Re: Question
22 3 13 27 19 7 31 8 12 28 10 9 25 32 27 0 21 26 29 2 14 30 24 5 19 1 19 27 3 5 15 19 8 35 8 24 19
are these live spun numbers or RNG, are they from one source or different the question is could your method win with this set of numbers
↧
↧
Re: If it's not rocket science it must be maths
Quote
If we only watch the situation 19 0 vs 180, could we say IT MUST CROSS TO 18 0 vs 19 0?Winkel
Is this forced by nature of the game to happen or is it a such rare event, that we couldn´t bet on this to happen?
Is that a math-fact or is it a lie or a trick?
If we have this proven, could we transfer our knowledge to other situations than 0 vs 0?
Yes it's true but is useless information, it's like you are claiming that ''Black'' will hit when there are 19 hits for the ''Black'' and 18 hits for the ''Red''.
In fact, you could bet "Black or ''red'' without waiting and without risking 19 times more units with the same probability.
I really don't see any edge in such bet and cannot understand why so many consider it semi-grail, it's far even from semi-grail status!
It's one thing to say that eventually all numbers will hit and completely another to predict in which specific spin is going to happen.
If you lose with 18 or 19 numbers bet, then what would you do? Martingale?!
What you are missing is ''when'', in other words the timing which is the most important!
Every event will happen eventually, but do you know when??
That's what separates winners from losers, I suggest you study Richard Farrow's timing concepts because with methods as GUT nobody can go far!
↧
Re: Holy Grail by Winkel open for discussion.
it's not grail, but useless information, it's like you are claiming that ''Black'' will hit when there are 19 hits for the ''Black'' and 18 hits for the ''Red''.
In fact, you could bet "Black or ''red'' without waiting and without risking 19 times more units with the same probability.
I really don't see any edge in such bet and cannot understand why so many consider it semi-grail, it's far even from semi-grail status!
It's one thing to say that eventually all numbers will hit and completely another to predict in which specific spin is going to happen.
If you lose with 18 or 19 numbers bet, then what would you do? Martingale?!
What you are missing is ''when'', in other words the timing which is the most important!
Every event will happen eventually, but do you know when??
That's what separates winners from losers, I suggest you study Richard Farrow's timing concepts because with methods as GUT nobody can go far!
In fact, you could bet "Black or ''red'' without waiting and without risking 19 times more units with the same probability.
I really don't see any edge in such bet and cannot understand why so many consider it semi-grail, it's far even from semi-grail status!
It's one thing to say that eventually all numbers will hit and completely another to predict in which specific spin is going to happen.
If you lose with 18 or 19 numbers bet, then what would you do? Martingale?!
What you are missing is ''when'', in other words the timing which is the most important!
Every event will happen eventually, but do you know when??
That's what separates winners from losers, I suggest you study Richard Farrow's timing concepts because with methods as GUT nobody can go far!
↧
Re: Holy Grail By Winkel.
it's not grail, but useless information, it's like you are claiming that ''Black'' will hit when there are 19 hits for the ''Black'' and 18 hits for the ''Red''.
In fact, you could bet "Black or ''red'' without waiting and without risking 19 times more units with the same probability.
I really don't see any edge in such bet and cannot understand why so many consider it semi-grail, it's far even from semi-grail status!
It's one thing to say that eventually all numbers will hit and completely another to predict in which specific spin is going to happen.
If you lose with 18 or 19 numbers bet, then what would you do? Martingale?!
What you are missing is ''when'', in other words the timing which is the most important!
Every event will happen eventually, but do you know when??
That's what separates winners from losers, I suggest you study Richard Farrow's timing concepts because with methods as GUT nobody can go far!
In fact, you could bet "Black or ''red'' without waiting and without risking 19 times more units with the same probability.
I really don't see any edge in such bet and cannot understand why so many consider it semi-grail, it's far even from semi-grail status!
It's one thing to say that eventually all numbers will hit and completely another to predict in which specific spin is going to happen.
If you lose with 18 or 19 numbers bet, then what would you do? Martingale?!
What you are missing is ''when'', in other words the timing which is the most important!
Every event will happen eventually, but do you know when??
That's what separates winners from losers, I suggest you study Richard Farrow's timing concepts because with methods as GUT nobody can go far!
↧
↧
Re: Nicole1: A Custom Paired Streets System
It's passing the wallpaper test.
↧
Re: Testing GUT - based on the eBook
Please keep in mind that bets on the higher categories (2x, 3x, 4x) have the best payout ratio. Limiting to strong will minimize your profits.
↧
Re: Question
Quote
That "longer" could be the rest of my lifeTurner
But you cannot declare with certainty that every method would last as long as your method, not only because of different results, but also because not all methods have the same exposure.
In terms of exposure to house edge, betting only one number is the best, thus could keep you in the game longer, am I right?
But try to look the same bet in a different way, a dealer, not necessarily skillful, could fairly easily dodge a specific number/pocket for veeeery long time, in that case you'd broke before you know it.
Where is the longer now?!
If all numbers have same chance at any given time then why some of them hit more than average, while others appear less than average?
It's fact and not a theory, biased wheels is not the answer because we encounter the same phenomenon more less to all wheels.
Yes, I do have the answer...there is a universal bias it's being called ''law of thirds''.
It's useless if you cannot comprehend why this always happens , on every wheel, with every croupier, even with RNG's and mixed results from different days and/or casinos.
It's the only universal fact, disregard it and you'll be looking for wheels' biases and dealers' signatures, searching from one wheel/dealer to the next, from one casino to the next...
Wasting plenty of time by gathering thousands of results before you place a single bet, just eventually to find out that the particular wheel has been replaced or leveled, your favorite croupier has been replaced or no longer spins predictable patterns because their employers instructed him/her to spin with different power from spin to spin (softer/harder)...
Personally I don't want to spend so much time just to know if this is good or not for betting.
Besides by using all those previous spins ain't that what you preach as fallacy?!
So why you think when you are using previous spins it's not fallacy but when someone else is using them it is?
Don't you know that dealers are spinning differently from spin to spin thus the slightest of differences produces different outcomes, therefore your wheel's and/or dealer's profile is rendered obsolete from one spin to the next, let alone from one day to the next!
Oh how nice to find that a wheel produces 3 pockets more than average and to expect that the exact same pockets will continue approximately with the same frequency of hits for a month, 6 months, a year, forever!
Does this sounds realistic to you?!
Roulette devices are not exception because they are as good as the method(s) installed, so if a method is fallacious those roulette devices would produce automated fallacies.
When a profile based on past outcomes/measurements becomes obsolete because the conditions have changed it's nothing more than a fallacy.
If you can say that past outcomes can't determine future ones, then I could say with equal certainty that past measurements/performance can't determine future ones!
If a wheel and/or dealer produces predictable patterns, the casinos are the first to know it because they have staff which looks for such things 24/7 and takes any necessary measures against these rare incidents.
So don't fool yourselves that you know better the casinos' property than the casinos! Don't you dare to condemn the rest who decided to follow a different approach because you are no better!
↧
Re: Dublinbet - short sessions
Fitzwilliam #2
Europe/Dublin time 03:50
Europe/Dublin time 03:50
↧
↧
Re: Pay close attention or not, I really dont care
2 (never more)
Starting off its usually 1 but not for long.
Ken
I don't doubt your results Ken, in fact I'm really happy about your success because you are the proof that this game could be profitable in long term!
However, I do have a question for you; what if a dealer decides to dodge your 2 numbers long enough to cause you considerable loses?
Wouldn't that be easy because you are covering just 2 out of 38 pockets??
I always read your posts with great interest, whether they make me laugh or learn it's a gain!
Perhaps Steve could read this post and suspect that you've create a duplicate account...
↧
Re: Question
Ive seen them win 1000s on 1 spin...and punch the air.
The universal "YES!" in human body language
↧
When did your progression career start? (if at all)
I would love to know at what point a roulette player believes in progressions?
Meaning, at first starting out...somewhere in the middle...or later in his/her roulette career?
Myself, it was for the first five years or so. I notice that most (not all) are the newer guys, maybe I'm wrong. This is not arguing, its a very interesting topic. Now dont lie please, lets all be HONEST with our answers.
Ken
Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17712.0
Meaning, at first starting out...somewhere in the middle...or later in his/her roulette career?
Myself, it was for the first five years or so. I notice that most (not all) are the newer guys, maybe I'm wrong. This is not arguing, its a very interesting topic. Now dont lie please, lets all be HONEST with our answers.
Ken
Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17712.0
↧
Re: Question
The universal "YES!" in human body language
I had such a moment when dealer George from Dublinbet casino spun my number (only 1 number betting) an incredible 6 times in 8 spins!
Of course I've rewarded him with generous tips, all the rest of my casino experiences are more like business as usual.
↧
↧
Re: Nicole1: A Custom Paired Streets System
Yes I test on real wheels:
Celtic Casino Live wheels-American
and European (sometimes Dubinbet) If a system flops
I will --scrap-- the system. So far this one's holding up
Celtic Casino Live wheels-American
and European (sometimes Dubinbet) If a system flops
I will --scrap-- the system. So far this one's holding up
↧
Re: Dublinbet - short sessions
Fitzwilliam #2
Europe/Dublin time 04:00
Europe/Dublin time 04:00
↧
Re: Dublinbet - short sessions
Fitzwilliam #2
Europe/Dublin time 03:50
Europe/Dublin time 03:50
↧
Re: Testing GUT - based on the eBook
↧
↧
33 Wannabe
Why 33%? This is a dozen bet, with a negative progression.
Procedure:
1. Pick one side High or Low, (this will be your playground)
2. Locate the last hit doublestreet within that particular H/L
3. Now bet that particular last hit doublestreet with 1u bet, also put 1u on the opposite H/L
4. Since it's a 33% bet, use a dozen negative progression until hit. (you bet both the ds AND the H/L-bet)
5. When hit restart from (2)
Progression: Dozen Negative
1 1 2 3 4 6 9 14 21 31 47 70 105
From the first test higest step in progression was step 10 (31u).
Played with 5u bets, (wingoal +500u, stoploss -1000u)
Bankroll needed:
200u (playing with 1u bets)
1000u (playing with 5u bets)
3/3 Games won
Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17714.0
Procedure:
1. Pick one side High or Low, (this will be your playground)
2. Locate the last hit doublestreet within that particular H/L
3. Now bet that particular last hit doublestreet with 1u bet, also put 1u on the opposite H/L
4. Since it's a 33% bet, use a dozen negative progression until hit. (you bet both the ds AND the H/L-bet)
5. When hit restart from (2)
Progression: Dozen Negative
1 1 2 3 4 6 9 14 21 31 47 70 105
From the first test higest step in progression was step 10 (31u).
Played with 5u bets, (wingoal +500u, stoploss -1000u)
Bankroll needed:
200u (playing with 1u bets)
1000u (playing with 5u bets)
3/3 Games won
Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17714.0
↧
Re: 33 Wannabe
This is a dozen bet, with a negative progression.
2. Locate the last hit doublestreet within that particular H/L
3. Now bet that particular last hit doublestreet with 1u bet
Thanks Ig!
Would it be dozen or doublestreet?
↧
Re: 33 Wannabe
Thanks Ig!
Would it be dozen or doublestreet?
33% is coverd in the particular H/L bet, and that is a doublestreet bet (1u bet on the opposite H/L, and that will give the money back only)
↧