What is the system that profits 30%?
I have a pretty easy system on my mind that would like to code if anyone is still actually coding in this threadI do...
↧
Re: Coding requests galore
↧
Re: Dublinbet - short sessions
Fitzwilliam #2
Europe/Dublin time 04:10
Europe/Dublin time 04:10
↧
↧
Re: Ken's Movie Ratings, 1-10
I answered that already....God only knows how many times.
Ken
Excuse me but probably have missed that, since you are not getting paid by Steve then WHY are you here??
What's your motivation? purpose?
Killing time??
↧
Re: Three's Company (80s)
How about Gomer Pyle?
That show provided good laughs also -- you can still see reruns in the middle of the night on some stations.
That show provided good laughs also -- you can still see reruns in the middle of the night on some stations.
↧
Re: Just curious what do you do for work
Engineer by profession.
In terms of recreational gambling, I am interested in roulette, craps, baccarat, and video poker.
In terms of recreational gambling, I am interested in roulette, craps, baccarat, and video poker.
↧
↧
Re: Three's Company (80s)
How about Rod Serling's, "Night Gallery".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFK99jDi3lk
Remember each episode started with the paintings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFK99jDi3lk
Remember each episode started with the paintings.
↧
Re: Three's Company (80s)
How about Rod Serling's, "Night Gallery".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFK99jDi3lk
Remember each episode started with the paintings.
Yep, another decent show!
Ken
↧
Re: Three's Company (80s)
The Carol Burnett Show and Saturday Night Live
↧
Re: Dublinbet - short sessions
Fitzwilliam #2
Europe/Dublin time 04:00
Europe/Dublin time 04:00
↧
↧
Re: Roulette 30 Another Forum Evaporates.
I quite liked it over there for a while until the troll REAL started upsetting everyone.
All the posts ended up like bun fights at a kids party.
Rather like here.![:o]( "Shocked")
All the posts ended up like bun fights at a kids party.
Rather like here.
↧
Re: Debra1: A Three-Number High/Low Trend System
Test: Celtic Casino European Wheel-
Wednesday, August 31,2016 @ 8:24pm CDT USA
Session total: -180
==============================
Test: Celtic Casino American Wheel-
Wednesday, August 31,2016 @ 8:36pm CDT USA
...28,25,5,31,23 (newest spin-value)
Bet 23,25,31: 1.) 12(x)-15 [same trigger active]
...25,5,31,23,12 (newest spin-value)
Bet 23,25,31: 2.) 36(x)-15*new trigger active
...5,31,23,12,36 (newest spin-value)
Bet 23,31,36: 3.) 2(x)-15 [same trigger active]
...31,23,12,36,2 (newest spin-value)
Bet 23,31,36: 4.) 25(x)-15*new trigger active
...23,12,36,2,25 (newest spin-value)
Bet 23,25,36: 5.) 5(x)-15*
...12,36,2,25,5 (newest spin-value)
Bet 2,5,12: 6.) 35(x)-15*
...36,2,25,5,35 (newest spin-value)
Bet 25,35,36: 7.) 7(x)-15*
...2,25,5,35,7 (newest spin-value)
Bet 2,5,7: 8.) 2(win)+165
---------------------------------------------------------------
+60
Wednesday, August 31,2016 @ 8:24pm CDT USA
Session total: -180
==============================
Test: Celtic Casino American Wheel-
Wednesday, August 31,2016 @ 8:36pm CDT USA
...28,25,5,31,23 (newest spin-value)
Bet 23,25,31: 1.) 12(x)-15 [same trigger active]
...25,5,31,23,12 (newest spin-value)
Bet 23,25,31: 2.) 36(x)-15*new trigger active
...5,31,23,12,36 (newest spin-value)
Bet 23,31,36: 3.) 2(x)-15 [same trigger active]
...31,23,12,36,2 (newest spin-value)
Bet 23,31,36: 4.) 25(x)-15*new trigger active
...23,12,36,2,25 (newest spin-value)
Bet 23,25,36: 5.) 5(x)-15*
...12,36,2,25,5 (newest spin-value)
Bet 2,5,12: 6.) 35(x)-15*
...36,2,25,5,35 (newest spin-value)
Bet 25,35,36: 7.) 7(x)-15*
...2,25,5,35,7 (newest spin-value)
Bet 2,5,7: 8.) 2(win)+165
---------------------------------------------------------------
+60
↧
Re: Debra1: A Three-Number High/Low Trend System
Test: Celtic Casino European Wheel-
Wednesday, August 31,2016 @ 8:48pm CDT USA
...26,1,15,16,35 (newest spin-value)
Bet 1,15,16: 1.) 16(win)+165
==============================
Test: Celtic Casino American Wheel-
Wednesday, August 31,2016 @ 8:50pm CDT USA
...7,2,36,11,10 (newest spin-value)
Bet 2,10,11: 1.) 12(x)-15*new trigger active
...2,36,11,10,12 (newest spin-value)
Bet 10,11,12: 2.) 20(x)-15 [same trigger active]
...36,11,10,12,20 (newest spin-value)
Bet 10,11,12: 3.) 24(x)-15 [same trigger active]
...11,10,12,20,24 (newest spin-value)
Bet 10,11,12: 4.) 12(win)+165
---------------------------------------------------------------
+120
Wednesday, August 31,2016 @ 8:48pm CDT USA
...26,1,15,16,35 (newest spin-value)
Bet 1,15,16: 1.) 16(win)+165
==============================
Test: Celtic Casino American Wheel-
Wednesday, August 31,2016 @ 8:50pm CDT USA
...7,2,36,11,10 (newest spin-value)
Bet 2,10,11: 1.) 12(x)-15*new trigger active
...2,36,11,10,12 (newest spin-value)
Bet 10,11,12: 2.) 20(x)-15 [same trigger active]
...36,11,10,12,20 (newest spin-value)
Bet 10,11,12: 3.) 24(x)-15 [same trigger active]
...11,10,12,20,24 (newest spin-value)
Bet 10,11,12: 4.) 12(win)+165
---------------------------------------------------------------
+120
↧
Re: U.S. online live roulette
*Important note about Jackpot Capital:
one time wagering requirement to cashout.
For example: you deposit $100-to cashout
you have to play at least $100 worth of games
one time wagering requirement to cashout.
For example: you deposit $100-to cashout
you have to play at least $100 worth of games
↧
↧
Re: Coding requests galore
@Turner,Done
I just notice post #22 have my email too, would you please...
↧
Re: Roulette 30 Another Forum Evaporates.
Well hello troll Caleb, Real, Xander, General and a whole entourage of baggage facades.
I see my name referenced amongst others and your cowardly and inappropriate remarks have caused distress and no good will for several years to several of my colleagues. You seem busy posting here and I understand from other sources you are intelligent and well qualified in some specialised areas and correspond with Jules but in terms of internet communication you seem to represent stone age level of understanding of the potential of this medium, and fail to realise what good can be accelerated by constructive co-operation such as has been achieved where I write.
You would be laughed out of court and not welcome at BetSelection.cc based upon your biased ( a speciality of yours) remarks and stone wall frozen lack of understanding of successful application of latest thinking and research in roulette which is a game of limitless potential and total fascination.
These days I do little posting or teaching because my time is filled with investment in the financial markets and the
wonderful opportunities in liquid lightning fast returns at live casinos.
I do not rely on technology or internet casinos for my income but instead play live in Australia and New Zealand casinos which are well managed and offer great opportunities for the professional player suitably time/space distributed amidst beautiful settings in Sydney, Queenstown, Gold Coast, Melbourne or Auckland.
You seem to delight in cynical, bigoted and offensive cheap shots at sincere writers including Gizmotron and Blue Angel. I have had disagreements with these very clever individuals but acknowledge they are dedicated, enthusiastic and genuine lovers of the roulette and have vast collective experience, and most importantly of all are open to new ideas. It appears you are not.
However you offensively post to many in a manner which should be moderated, but which is tolerated through the operating philosophy of the forum. Nevertheless, no offence to Steve because in my communications with him he has been fair and respectful, as I with him for his wonderful work in establishing the rouletteplayers.org game which provides a useful model in the face of house edge, to test various ideas, techniques and strategies.
Again I emphasise MB16 is NOT a winning bet but I have demonstrated that through accurate reading of a game, understanding of particular bet characteristic, and successful application of timing for entry and exit, a substantail positive earning can be achieved as I have demonstrated with my players on Steve's table.
You are remembered for your outrageous critique of Dr Martin Blakey shortly before his untimely death. Disgusting is the description I suggest for your performance at that time, and I personally hold you responsible for the appalling state of exchanges on a failed experimental forum at that time. Of course no moderation leads to disaster because all progress needs bounds or else chaos ensues and your attitude at the time delighted in the anarchy that followed. Anarchy does not enable sustainable progress.
Nevertheless we move on and let the water flow under the bridge but still you seem to be obsessed with imagined scams and
unethical behaviour on forums yet you represent the absolute lowest level of writing I have ever encountered on any roulette forum. That you remain lodged in this location amazes me as surely any imaginary audience is totally bored by now with your standard statements.
It is best to ignore your nonsense as trolls like you feed from any energy directed their way. However this is a one off summary response to your nonsense. Steve would do better without your presence. I have responded on behalf of my colleagues as well as myself because your claims are imaginary, and dangerously deluded.
Betselection.cc through intelligent,reasonable and well considered moderation has encouraged remarkable contributions such as the brilliant work of Thomas Leor, Gizmotron, Bally, Blue Angel and many others who are able to write and exchange ideas in an enlightened, disciplined and adult safe environment. This is the new standard paradigm for the maturing internet communications that facilitate and encourage accelerating research, development and effective constructive communications.
XXVV
Sydney, Australia
I see my name referenced amongst others and your cowardly and inappropriate remarks have caused distress and no good will for several years to several of my colleagues. You seem busy posting here and I understand from other sources you are intelligent and well qualified in some specialised areas and correspond with Jules but in terms of internet communication you seem to represent stone age level of understanding of the potential of this medium, and fail to realise what good can be accelerated by constructive co-operation such as has been achieved where I write.
You would be laughed out of court and not welcome at BetSelection.cc based upon your biased ( a speciality of yours) remarks and stone wall frozen lack of understanding of successful application of latest thinking and research in roulette which is a game of limitless potential and total fascination.
These days I do little posting or teaching because my time is filled with investment in the financial markets and the
wonderful opportunities in liquid lightning fast returns at live casinos.
I do not rely on technology or internet casinos for my income but instead play live in Australia and New Zealand casinos which are well managed and offer great opportunities for the professional player suitably time/space distributed amidst beautiful settings in Sydney, Queenstown, Gold Coast, Melbourne or Auckland.
You seem to delight in cynical, bigoted and offensive cheap shots at sincere writers including Gizmotron and Blue Angel. I have had disagreements with these very clever individuals but acknowledge they are dedicated, enthusiastic and genuine lovers of the roulette and have vast collective experience, and most importantly of all are open to new ideas. It appears you are not.
However you offensively post to many in a manner which should be moderated, but which is tolerated through the operating philosophy of the forum. Nevertheless, no offence to Steve because in my communications with him he has been fair and respectful, as I with him for his wonderful work in establishing the rouletteplayers.org game which provides a useful model in the face of house edge, to test various ideas, techniques and strategies.
Again I emphasise MB16 is NOT a winning bet but I have demonstrated that through accurate reading of a game, understanding of particular bet characteristic, and successful application of timing for entry and exit, a substantail positive earning can be achieved as I have demonstrated with my players on Steve's table.
You are remembered for your outrageous critique of Dr Martin Blakey shortly before his untimely death. Disgusting is the description I suggest for your performance at that time, and I personally hold you responsible for the appalling state of exchanges on a failed experimental forum at that time. Of course no moderation leads to disaster because all progress needs bounds or else chaos ensues and your attitude at the time delighted in the anarchy that followed. Anarchy does not enable sustainable progress.
Nevertheless we move on and let the water flow under the bridge but still you seem to be obsessed with imagined scams and
unethical behaviour on forums yet you represent the absolute lowest level of writing I have ever encountered on any roulette forum. That you remain lodged in this location amazes me as surely any imaginary audience is totally bored by now with your standard statements.
It is best to ignore your nonsense as trolls like you feed from any energy directed their way. However this is a one off summary response to your nonsense. Steve would do better without your presence. I have responded on behalf of my colleagues as well as myself because your claims are imaginary, and dangerously deluded.
Betselection.cc through intelligent,reasonable and well considered moderation has encouraged remarkable contributions such as the brilliant work of Thomas Leor, Gizmotron, Bally, Blue Angel and many others who are able to write and exchange ideas in an enlightened, disciplined and adult safe environment. This is the new standard paradigm for the maturing internet communications that facilitate and encourage accelerating research, development and effective constructive communications.
XXVV
Sydney, Australia
↧
Re: R U A 0x Watcher
here it is
But if you could Keep The Faith look last spin. These 60 spins still got 29 non-hit in 60, its just how the repeats come.
So if you was to just watch, whats the info for 1st 19 non-hits to hit, average 2 spins, so would you go in for the non-hit after the 2 repeats, same for the 18th to come in, came before its known maximum
Code: [Select]
Spin No. Spin Repeat? Non-hit count Progression Result Bank
1 32 37
2 8 36
3 3 35
4 28 34
5 26 33
6 10 32
7 33 31
8 14 30
9 6 29
10 24 28
11 6 R 27 1 -27 -27
12 24 R 27 2 -54 -81
13 36 27 3 27 -54
14 2 26 2 20 -34
15 1 25 1 11 -23
16 2 R 24 1 -24 -47
17 4 24 2 24 -23
18 28 R 23 1 -23 -46
19 27 23 2 26 -20
20 7 22 1 14 -6
21 23 21 1 15 9
22 26 R 20 1 -20 -11
23 28 R 20 2 -40 -51
24 7 R 20 3 -60 -111
25 6 R 20 4 -80 -191
26 6 R 20 5 -100 -291
27 0 20 6 96 -195
28 5 19 5 85 -110
29 7 R 18 4 -72 -182
30 6 R 18 5 -90 -272
31 3 R 18 6 -108 -380
32 11 18 7 126 -254
33 24 R 17 6 -102 -356
34 25 17 7 133 -223
35 3 R 16 6 -96 -319
36 8 R 16 7 -112 -431
37 8 R 16 8 -128 -559
38 34 16 9 180 -379
39 9 15 8 168 -211
40 36 R 14 7 -98 -309
41 8 R 14 8 -112 -421
42 2 R 14 9 -126 -547
43 13 14 10 220 -327
44 0 R 13 9 -117 -444
45 26 R 13 10 -130 -574
46 15 13 11 253 -321
47 34 R 12 10 -120 -441
48 28 R 12 11 -132 -573
49 14 R 12 12 -144 -717
50 8 R 12 13 -156 -873
51 8 R 12 14 -168 -1041
52 17 12 15 360 -681
53 35 11 14 350 -331
54 9 R 10 13 -130 -461
55 17 R 10 14 -140 -601
56 31 10 15 390 -211
57 34 R 9 14 -126 -337
58 6 R 9 15 -135 -472
59 12 9 16 432 -40
60 1 R 8 15 -120 -160
61 19 8 16 448 288
So if you was to just watch, whats the info for 1st 19 non-hits to hit, average 2 spins, so would you go in for the non-hit after the 2 repeats, same for the 18th to come in, came before its known maximum
↧
Re: R U A 0x Watcher
Now as we can see above, different entry points.
So yesterdays loss, what would of happened if we start 10 spins later?
Still get a block of repeats, but we go till we lose 800 to comply to priyankas' request and survive +£167
10 spins later, never understimate non-hits
Running out of spins, but we see how if you was to reset you'd be in a winning stream.
Above, what could happen in those next 40 spins?
So yesterdays loss, what would of happened if we start 10 spins later?
Still get a block of repeats, but we go till we lose 800 to comply to priyankas' request and survive +£167
Code: [Select]
Spin No. Spin Repeat? Non-hit count Progression Result Bank
1 6 37
2 24 36
3 36 35
4 2 34
5 1 33
6 2 R 32
7 4 32
8 28 31
9 27 30
10 7 29
11 23 28 1 8 8
12 26 27 1 9 17
13 28 R 26 1 -26 -9
14 7 R 26 2 -52 -61
15 6 R 26 3 -78 -139
16 6 R 26 4 -104 -243
17 0 26 5 50 -193
18 5 25 4 44 -149
19 7 R 24 3 -72 -221
20 6 R 24 4 -96 -317
21 3 24 5 60 -257
22 11 23 4 52 -205
23 24 R 22 3 -66 -271
24 25 22 4 56 -215
25 3 R 21 3 -63 -278
26 8 21 4 60 -218
27 8 R 20 3 -60 -278
28 34 20 4 64 -214
29 9 19 3 51 -163
30 36 R 18 2 -36 -199
31 8 R 18 3 -54 -253
32 2 R 18 4 -72 -325
33 13 18 5 90 -235
34 0 R 17 4 -68 -303
35 26 R 17 5 -85 -388
36 15 17 6 114 -274
37 34 R 16 5 -80 -354
38 28 R 16 6 -96 -450
39 14 16 7 140 -310
40 8 R 15 6 -90 -400
41 8 R 15 7 -105 -505
42 17 15 8 168 -337
43 35 14 7 154 -183
44 9 R 13 6 -78 -261
45 17 R 13 7 -91 -352
46 31 13 8 184 -168
47 34 R 12 7 -84 -252
48 6 R 12 8 -96 -348
49 12 12 9 216 -132
50 1 R 11 8 -88 -220
51 19 11 9 225 5
52 9 R 10 8 -80 -75
53 4 R 10 9 -90 -165
54 11 R 10 10 -100 -265
55 9 R 10 11 -110 -375
56 11 R 10 12 -120 -495
57 22 10 13 338 -157
58 30 9 12 324 167
59 0 R 8 11 -88 79
60 18 8 12 336 415
61 13 R 7 11 -77 338
Code: [Select]
Spin No. Spin Repeat? Non-hit count Progression Result Bank
1 23 37
2 26 36
3 28 35
4 7 34
5 6 33
6 6 R 32
7 0 32
8 5 31
9 7 R 30
10 6 R 30
11 3 30 1 6 6
12 11 29 1 7 13
13 24 28 1 8 21
14 25 27 1 9 30
15 3 R 26 1 -26 4
16 8 26 2 20 24
17 8 R 25 1 -25 -1
18 34 25 2 22 21
19 9 24 1 12 33
20 36 23 1 13 46
21 8 R 22 1 -22 24
22 2 22 2 28 52
23 13 21 1 15 67
24 0 R 20 1 -20 47
25 26 R 20 2 -40 7
26 15 20 3 48 55
27 34 R 19 2 -38 17
28 28 R 19 3 -57 -40
29 14 19 4 68 28
30 8 R 18 3 -54 -26
31 8 R 18 4 -72 -98
32 17 18 5 90 -8
33 35 17 4 76 68
34 9 R 16 3 -48 20
35 17 R 16 4 -64 -44
36 31 16 5 100 56
37 34 R 15 4 -60 -4
38 6 R 15 5 -75 -79
39 12 15 6 126 47
40 1 14 5 110 157
41 19 13 4 92 249
42 9 R 12 3 -36 213
43 4 12 4 96 309
44 11 R 11 3 -33 276
45 9 R 11 4 -44 232
46 11 R 11 5 -55 177
47 22 11 6 150 327
48 30 10 5 130 457
49 0 R 9 4 -36 421
50 18 9 5 135 556
51 13 R 8 4 -32 524
52 19 R 8 5 -40 484
53 19 R 8 6 -48 436
54 10 8 7 196 632
55 11 R 7 6 -42 590
56 21 7 7 203 793
57 5 R 6 6 -36 757
58 21 R 6 7 -42 715
59 21 R 6 8 -48 667
60 4 R 6 9 -54 613
Code: [Select]
Spin No. Spin Repeat? Non-hit count Progression Result Bank
1 3 37
2 11 36
3 24 35
4 25 34
5 3 R 33
6 8 33
7 8 R 32
8 34 32
9 9 31
10 36 30
11 8 R 29 1 -29 -29
12 2 29 2 14 -15
13 13 28 1 8 -7
14 0 27 1 9 2
15 26 26 1 10 12
16 15 25 1 11 23
17 34 R 24 1 -24 -1
18 28 24 2 24 23
19 14 23 1 13 36
20 8 R 22 1 -22 14
21 8 R 22 2 -44 -30
22 17 22 3 42 12
23 35 21 2 30 42
24 9 R 20 1 -20 22
25 17 R 20 2 -40 -18
26 31 20 3 48 30
27 34 R 19 2 -38 -8
28 6 19 3 51 43
29 12 18 2 36 79
30 1 17 1 19 98
31 19 16 1 20 118
32 9 R 15 1 -15 103
33 4 15 2 42 145
34 11 R 14 1 -14 131
35 9 R 14 2 -28 103
36 11 R 14 3 -42 61
37 22 14 4 88 149
38 30 13 3 69 218
39 0 R 12 2 -24 194
40 18 12 3 72 266
41 13 R 11 2 -22 244
42 19 R 11 3 -33 211
43 19 R 11 4 -44 167
44 10 11 5 125 292
45 11 R 10 4 -40 252
46 21 10 5 130 382
47 5 9 4 108 490
48 21 R 8 3 -24 466
49 21 R 8 4 -32 434
50 4 R 8 5 -40 394
51 R
52 R
53 R
54 R
55 R
56 R
57 R
58 R
59 R
60 R
Code: [Select]
Spin No. Spin Repeat? Non-hit count Progression Result Bank
1 8 37
2 2 36
3 13 35
4 0 34
5 26 33
6 15 32
7 34 31
8 28 30
9 14 29
10 8 R 28
11 8 R 28 1 -28 -28
12 17 28 2 16 -12
13 35 27 1 9 -3
14 9 26 1 10 7
15 17 R 25 1 -25 -18
16 31 25 2 22 4
17 34 R 24 1 -24 -20
18 6 24 2 24 4
19 12 23 1 13 17
20 1 22 1 14 31
21 19 21 1 15 46
22 9 R 20 1 -20 26
23 4 20 2 32 58
24 11 19 1 17 75
25 9 R 18 1 -18 57
26 11 R 18 2 -36 21
27 22 18 3 54 75
28 30 17 2 38 113
29 0 R 16 1 -16 97
30 18 16 2 40 137
31 13 R 15 1 -15 122
32 19 R 15 2 -30 92
33 19 R 15 3 -45 47
34 10 15 4 84 131
35 11 R 14 3 -42 89
36 21 14 4 88 177
37 5 13 3 69 246
38 21 R 12 2 -24 222
39 21 R 12 3 -36 186
40 4 R 12 4 -48 138
41 R
42 R
43 R
44 R
45 R
46 R
47 R
48 R
49 R
50 R
51 R
52 R
53 R
54 R
55 R
56 R
57 R
58 R
59 R
60 R
Code: [Select]
Spin No. Spin Repeat? Non-hit count Progression Result Bank
1 8 37
2 17 36
3 35 35
4 9 34
5 17 R 33
6 31 33
7 34 32
8 6 31
9 12 30
10 1 29
11 19 28 1 8 8
12 9 R 27 1 -27 -19
13 4 27 2 18 -1
14 11 26 1 10 9
15 9 R 25 1 -25 -16
16 11 R 25 2 -50 -66
17 22 25 3 33 -33
18 30 24 2 24 -9
19 0 23 1 13 4
20 18 22 1 14 18
21 13 21 1 15 33
22 19 R 20 1 -20 13
23 19 R 20 2 -40 -27
24 10 20 3 48 21
25 11 R 19 2 -38 -17
26 21 19 3 51 34
27 5 18 2 36 70
28 21 R 17 1 -17 53
29 21 R 17 2 -34 19
30 4 R 17 3 -51 -32
31 R
32 R
33 R
34 R
35 R
36 R
37 R
38 R
39 R
40 R
41 R
42 R
43 R
44 R
45 R
46 R
47 R
48 R
49 R
50 R
51 R
52 R
53 R
54 R
55 R
56 R
57 R
58 R
59 R
60 R
Code: [Select]
Spin No. Spin Repeat? Non-hit count Progression Result Bank
1 19 37
2 9 36
3 4 35
4 11 34
5 9 R 33
6 11 R 33
7 22 33
8 30 32
9 0 31
10 18 30
11 13 29 1 7 7
12 19 R 28 1 -28 -21
13 19 R 28 2 -56 -77
14 10 28 3 24 -53
15 11 R 27 2 -54 -107
16 21 27 3 27 -80
17 5 26 2 20 -60
18 21 R 25 1 -25 -85
19 21 R 25 2 -50 -135
20 4 R 25 3 -75 -210
21 R
22 R
23 R
24 R
25 R
26 R
27 R
28 R
29 R
30 R
31 R
32 R
33 R
34 R
35 R
36 R
37 R
38 R
39 R
40 R
41 R
42 R
43 R
44 R
45 R
46 R
47 R
48 R
49 R
50 R
51 R
52 R
53 R
54 R
55 R
56 R
57 R
58 R
59 R
60 R
↧
↧
Re: Why random results are NOT independent
If anything is possible then why don't we see the same number for 10 consecutive spins?
This is the HG. Just double up 10 times on any 36 numbers. Thanks BA!
↧
Re: Math Quizs
↧
Re: Why random results are NOT independent
BA your logic is wrong, and exact details why have been explained by multiple members but you are still not understanding it.
Have you ever seen the sequence 1,9,34,7,2? I bet you haven't. Historically it has happened as often as 1,2,3,4,5. Just test with billions of rng spins and see for yourself. You are still not understanding this.
You are stuck in classic gamblers fallacy. Don't believe it? Just test. Use the free software i published
Have you ever seen the sequence 1,9,34,7,2? I bet you haven't. Historically it has happened as often as 1,2,3,4,5. Just test with billions of rng spins and see for yourself. You are still not understanding this.
You are stuck in classic gamblers fallacy. Don't believe it? Just test. Use the free software i published
↧