Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all 13533 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Above average

$
0
0
When you say "above average," over how many spins are you talking about?

Yeap. Also for how long are you monitoring them above average and flat bet them?  Do you stop it after a number of cycles (eg you stop after 185 spins?  5*37cycles) or do you flat bet forever as long as a number has shown above expected after any number of spins at all?

Andruchi System - The Maths

$
0
0
A member sent me a pm asking about the Andruchi system (google it). It's been exposed as a scam numerous times but I don't think the dodgy calculations on the website have been exposed for what they are (the member was asking specifically about those).

Basically the system involves waiting for 20 unique numbers to appear, the procedure is to then bet for the next 3 spins (or until a hit) on the remaining 17 numbers using a progression.

Andruchi uses some weird calculation to find the probability of getting at least one hit in the 3 spins, which, according to him, is 91.49%. This gives the probability of a progression bust of 100% - 91.49% = 8.51%. The average win is 8.33 units and a progression loss of will cost you 68 units, and on this basis the total expectation is positive (see calculation below in the image).



The correct calculation to find the probability of at least one hit in the 3 spins is as follows (I'll start from first principles so it's easy to follow):

You are betting on 17 numbers, and if you win it will either be on the first, second, or third spin.

The chance of a win is 17/37 and the chance of a loss is 1 - 17/37 = 20/37

Win on spin 1: The probability is just 17/37
Win on spin 2: You lose on the first spin and win on the second, so the probability is 20/37 * 17/37
Win on spin 3: You lose on the first and second spins and win on the third, so the probability is 20/37 * 20/37 * 17/37

Since if you win it must be on either spin 1 or spin 2 or spin 3, and since these results are mutually exclusive, we just add them to get the probability of at least one hit in the 3 spins.

17/37 + 20/37*17/37 + 20/37*20/37*17/37 = 0.8421 or 84.21% (rather less than Andruchi's result).

Now this gives the probability of a complete loss as 100% - 84.21% = 15.79% (rather more than Andruchi's result).

Now if we repeat his calculation using these probabilities, the expectation is:

0.8421*8.33 - 0.1579*68 = -3.723

Not positive after all.  :(






Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17777.0

Re: Theory Test On Double Streets/Lines

$
0
0
Moderators please delete this thread.

I cant enjoy it when an idiot troll steps in and the site owner doesnt give a shit less. Mr J is a blabbering idiot.

Maybe steve should READ a few pages back. Yes steve. Since you chimed in why dont u go 2 pages back and read how mr j went on. Even another moderator posted in this thread that he was trolling.

please delete the thread asap

Re: "Numbers", "Time" and "Pockets"

$
0
0
Blue,

Why don't you take into account wheel speed and spin direction?

I didn't want to make it more complicated than what already is.
Sometimes dealers are giving me hard time by spinning quickly from one spin to the next, it would become unplayable if I added more conditions and rules.

Re: Above average

$
0
0
Above average I mean in 37 spins. If it hits 2 times in 37 spins it's above average. If it hits 3 times in 74spins  it's above average. ...etc

And then you got those few numbers (1-4) that really hit more than above average.  ;)

I'm done after a good 200 spins. Mostly much faster.

Re: Above average

$
0
0
i calculate to see how many spins it needs to be shown to be considered a hot number. for example in 260 spins now it needs a number to be hit 9 times or more to be counted above expected.
What is the calc to get the answer for a hot number

Re: Spite voting etc.

$
0
0
The point is trying to have a working forum

Some people come in full riot gear everyday

Pounding the same thing in even off topic threads

Disruptive

Caleb had a gamblers fallacy remark in conspiracy thread. For no reason. That is the definition of trolling. A mod deleted it. But thats an example of the stupidity that makes this hard

If you moderate caleb it will help. This way if it is an antagonizing post it never makes it to the board.

You cannot be good for a forum if every interaction is berating people and putting them down. 98 percent of his posts.

Re: Above average

$
0
0
If you're chasing hot numbers, try to track them by spin direction as well.  Meaning keep one set of hot numbers for each spin direction. 

Re: Devil´s Grail - Made in the Casino´s Hell - aka MITCH

$
0
0
Prof
are you going to continue with this topic, there's plenty waiting.

If some people come in to the topic with stupid comments ask Turner to remove it.

Re: Above average

$
0
0
@BO .... I did like your doing it. But that session wasn't an average one. Just one of those rare ones. But your way does holds up so far. It's ok that you get some dd. Use a good MM and keep going  :thumbsup:
(I'll keep testing this as well)

@General..... I'm only playing on a one direction European wheel. But thx for the advice.  :)

Re: Bank Roll?

$
0
0
Typically when i play with $5 units i brint $200

For a weekend in AC $1000

Re: Spite voting etc.

$
0
0
Winkel calm down. Just let me know the exact post where you think ken began to be a troll on your thread. Give me the exact post and please calmly explain the problem.

RG, being nice or a prick has nothing to do with logic. Right now I'm trying to understand what has Winkel so upset.

So far all winkel reported is this fom ken:

Quote
....and another post attacking me. RG, Turner....where you at?

Quote
Nope, wrong again. I love how I get attacked and when I RESPOND, I am "looking for a rise"? Its real simple, I wont back down. Leave me alone, its not too tough.

So far it looks like a big fuss over nothing. BUT I'm asking winkel to provide the info above

Re: Bank Roll?

Re: Bank Roll?

Re: Spite voting etc.

$
0
0
Steve,

I can't read Winkel's mind.

However, everything was fine, up until Turner made a comment on reply 65.
Turner asked Ken a question on reply 68.

I think, that's what has upset Winkel.

That to me not by any means intentional on Turner's part, but made Ken answer the question.  I haven't read any further.

Groups test now available

Re: Spite voting etc.

$
0
0
I have a simpler idea. Everyone just mind their own business and leave eachother alone, and don't get so upset if someone doesn't like you.

Re: Dublinbet - short sessions

$
0
0
Fitzwilliam #2 
Europe/Dublin time 04:20

Re: Ken's Movie Ratings, 1-10

$
0
0
Sully >> 7

The Disappointments Room >> 2

Re: Spite voting etc.

$
0
0
why have the item there, its stupid, think i'll jizz on Ken today just to stir it up a bit more, wind the big dogup
Viewing all 13533 articles
Browse latest View live