BA, i don really care if you are Kav or not, but there are numerous reasons why i have little doubt. Your ips being not just in greece, but all the same region of greece too. There more but lets not get distracted.
Regarding your proposal, doubling your bankroll is not proof of a winning system. In fact virtually any progression system can double the bankroll in the short term. The problem is when the inevitable losing streak occurs, you lose it all and more. A progression system can quite easily show profit over tens of thousands of spins with some luck, by winning on the right spins for maximum profit. I explained how it works in a previous post.
Another problem with your proposal is there is no way i could sit and watch you play a martingale, all to prove to you the martingale loses. I have better things to do really, even if it was practical. You know its not practical at all, so really your proposal is absurd, as is your expectation that anyone would take it seriously.
There is no escaping this with the martingale. Loss is inevitable unless you increase your odds of winning, and betting on sleepers doesnt work. You still dont undestand it. You still think i need to know your kavoras bet money management to properly assess it. The bet selection is all i need to know. Any professional can tell you.
Also any martingale could theoretically win billions if you had unlimited bankroll and no table betting limit. But be realistic. There is a betting limit, so theoretical approaches arent enough.
Are you serously saying that doubling your bankroll in maybe 2000 spins compares to testing millions of spins? And you say im the one hiding? any system can win in the short term, which is obviously why you prefere a short term test. I mean 30 units day in even 2 months is maybe around 2000 spins. in so few spins you can even double bankroll betting black with some luck over so few spins. Practically any of the progression systems that come free with rx can do the same, so why arent they making millions?
Kav, im all for a challenge, but if im going to front $100k youll need to better than that. So heres what i propose:
1. we get the system properly coded in rx, and test millions of spins. anyone else can test too. someone please give a price quote for the coding.
2. if you see the maximum bets needed to profit are clearly outside typical table limits, then clearly your martingale is no better than any other. That means you lost the challenge. ie $5 min and $250 max bet is typical.
i could have a martingale betting red and doubling after a loss, and it would be no different to your system except it either tanks or wins quicker, depending on luck and the spins. you need to understand martingale relies entirely on maximum bet and available bankroll.
3. we run simlar tests with the kavouras bet. This will give you another chance, althought you already say on your site the most it beats is 20,000 spins, with some luck. So you already know it doesnt work. But you have the audacity to claim my computers are a scam and overpriced, when you can plainly see them get a 120% edge in the public demo - just one of many ive conducted. Know what it means Kav? It means youre a liar. You have no integrity. You just dont like me for telling you why your systems lose, and for removing your spam. So you publish absolute bullshit as revenge. You know i also have people i dont like, but i never lie about them and still give them credit where due.
4. you then apologize publicly and remove your rubbish about me on your site. if you really arent kav, then you agree to follow a process so you can prove it. you may think its not possible without kavs assistance, assuming you arent him, but i have a simple way.
There may be some details to work out, but basically im saying you can apologize to me when you see im right. And if wrong, sincerely ill pay you $100k aud, give a public apology and ill close every roulette site i have.
Regarding your proposal, doubling your bankroll is not proof of a winning system. In fact virtually any progression system can double the bankroll in the short term. The problem is when the inevitable losing streak occurs, you lose it all and more. A progression system can quite easily show profit over tens of thousands of spins with some luck, by winning on the right spins for maximum profit. I explained how it works in a previous post.
Another problem with your proposal is there is no way i could sit and watch you play a martingale, all to prove to you the martingale loses. I have better things to do really, even if it was practical. You know its not practical at all, so really your proposal is absurd, as is your expectation that anyone would take it seriously.
There is no escaping this with the martingale. Loss is inevitable unless you increase your odds of winning, and betting on sleepers doesnt work. You still dont undestand it. You still think i need to know your kavoras bet money management to properly assess it. The bet selection is all i need to know. Any professional can tell you.
Also any martingale could theoretically win billions if you had unlimited bankroll and no table betting limit. But be realistic. There is a betting limit, so theoretical approaches arent enough.
Quote
Or do you prefer to hide behind RNG simulations and posts in forums?!
I'm willing to put my money where my mouth is if you do the same!
So now it's your call, what it will be??
Are you serously saying that doubling your bankroll in maybe 2000 spins compares to testing millions of spins? And you say im the one hiding? any system can win in the short term, which is obviously why you prefere a short term test. I mean 30 units day in even 2 months is maybe around 2000 spins. in so few spins you can even double bankroll betting black with some luck over so few spins. Practically any of the progression systems that come free with rx can do the same, so why arent they making millions?
Kav, im all for a challenge, but if im going to front $100k youll need to better than that. So heres what i propose:
1. we get the system properly coded in rx, and test millions of spins. anyone else can test too. someone please give a price quote for the coding.
2. if you see the maximum bets needed to profit are clearly outside typical table limits, then clearly your martingale is no better than any other. That means you lost the challenge. ie $5 min and $250 max bet is typical.
i could have a martingale betting red and doubling after a loss, and it would be no different to your system except it either tanks or wins quicker, depending on luck and the spins. you need to understand martingale relies entirely on maximum bet and available bankroll.
3. we run simlar tests with the kavouras bet. This will give you another chance, althought you already say on your site the most it beats is 20,000 spins, with some luck. So you already know it doesnt work. But you have the audacity to claim my computers are a scam and overpriced, when you can plainly see them get a 120% edge in the public demo - just one of many ive conducted. Know what it means Kav? It means youre a liar. You have no integrity. You just dont like me for telling you why your systems lose, and for removing your spam. So you publish absolute bullshit as revenge. You know i also have people i dont like, but i never lie about them and still give them credit where due.
4. you then apologize publicly and remove your rubbish about me on your site. if you really arent kav, then you agree to follow a process so you can prove it. you may think its not possible without kavs assistance, assuming you arent him, but i have a simple way.
There may be some details to work out, but basically im saying you can apologize to me when you see im right. And if wrong, sincerely ill pay you $100k aud, give a public apology and ill close every roulette site i have.