And kav, consider this:
The kavouras bet is just scattered chips, which you say is "ingeniuosly chaotic" to cover lots of areas of the wheel, supposedly so the dealer cannot avoid your bets. Uh, why not just bet red or black?
But anyway, surely even youd acknowledge your bets dont change the odds. Whether just you, or 10 people placed the bets, wouldnt make a difference. So clearly, flat bets gives you no edge all, and you claim the money management is the magic.
Well my computers can get a 120% edge, with flat bets.
So just imagine if we combined your apparently magic money management with my useless overpriced computers that get a 120% edge... instead of using your kavouras bet which anyone would know doesnt change the odds at all. Wouldnt that be a tad bit better than your self proclaimed famous bet?
Kav if you are going to argue against truth, you will lose. And if you persist in lying about me, its not going to end well for you.
Remember how it started. I just removed your spam like i would remove any spam. And i tried to explain why your approach wont work. You took it very personally. Thats your shortcoming, not mine. Any man with interity would accept truth and learn, not attack the person trying to educate and help them.
The kavouras bet is just scattered chips, which you say is "ingeniuosly chaotic" to cover lots of areas of the wheel, supposedly so the dealer cannot avoid your bets. Uh, why not just bet red or black?
But anyway, surely even youd acknowledge your bets dont change the odds. Whether just you, or 10 people placed the bets, wouldnt make a difference. So clearly, flat bets gives you no edge all, and you claim the money management is the magic.
Well my computers can get a 120% edge, with flat bets.
So just imagine if we combined your apparently magic money management with my useless overpriced computers that get a 120% edge... instead of using your kavouras bet which anyone would know doesnt change the odds at all. Wouldnt that be a tad bit better than your self proclaimed famous bet?
Kav if you are going to argue against truth, you will lose. And if you persist in lying about me, its not going to end well for you.
Remember how it started. I just removed your spam like i would remove any spam. And i tried to explain why your approach wont work. You took it very personally. Thats your shortcoming, not mine. Any man with interity would accept truth and learn, not attack the person trying to educate and help them.