. but let me add that I sent an email
with questions. Basic questions. And I got the rudest reply I ever got in my
life. Telling me I should learn to read......
Geez
Rude
I wonder why he would ever say that to you.
. but let me add that I sent an email
with questions. Basic questions. And I got the rudest reply I ever got in my
life. Telling me I should learn to read......
Him (and others) are assuming you go back past spins and bet to win. In other words and in laymens terms 5 spins back was number 5 and you say i would have bet 5
Just the typical case of him (and others) not reading it all
If he did he would realise you are just showing how you would have played it given those past spins
If you give me 20 past spins and i say i would have played ktf or something else given tbose spins thats not curve fitting thats how you would have played given that scenario period
Best to ignore it
If i explained given the prior spins how id play thats not curve fitting. Thats just them not understanding. Lol.
On your 8th roll was that a mistake? Shouldn't that been ODD? You have the bet EVEN.
Down as you win is "ass backwards" and everyone knows this by now-Turbo
how many numbers you played with your method?
1 to 12. It depends on what and how I'm playing though.
I'll try and show you simulations tomorrow of various betting horizons if you want to see them.