Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all 13528 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Easter

$
0
0
Happy Easter !




Great meal . Intrigued  by the color  of the wine.


ND

Re: Pray for ...

$
0
0
Yes, sorry for you (us), happy Easter anyhow!

Re: Basics - that no one wants to hear

$
0
0
One thing that changed my direction was after a few chats with Number Six and with Iggiv.

The subject was that of personal permanence

Its very hard to imagine, but when you imagine it correctly, it makes a difference to how you play.

With personal permanence, you can only consider numbers that show when you have wagered on the carpet. So, you cant use marque numbers, or numbers that occurred when you take a break or are not at a roulette wheel ("a" roulette wheel, not THE roulette wheel)

People tend to think that normal distribution is in groups of numbers serially touching each other....like on a marque. But random numbers dont touch each other. They are totally independent and any 37 numbers from 37 roulette wheels will follow normal distribution.

Its this thinking that a group of sequential numbers from 1 wheel is what displays ND, and that way only, which leads to illusions.

Illusions like tracking back to get a set of numbers, virtual spins, using past spins from the marque.

Betting ideas apart, this way of looking at random numbers frees you from illusions.

IMO  :thumbsup:

Re: KTF's cousin named WTF (if everyone agrees)

$
0
0
Had a bust today on airball :

4      23      9      19
25    5        35    25R
29    20     15     19
28    30     14     36
34    25R   13     9
7      12       9      10
8      7R     23R   5R
0      21     10      17
0R   27     15      18
29R 11     11R   10
---------------------------------
8      +3   

Nothing could save me.
Can't win them all

Two repeats in the first 10 spins... Ouch!! I would simply have not touched that!!

Simon.

Re: Easter

Re: Vaccines

$
0
0
1. Most lies need some truth, to make the lie believable. Vaccines is the same.

2. Vaccinations are weakened forms of the disease, to build the body's natural defence. This isnt such a bad thing generally. But the problem is that many vaccinations:

* Contain harmful additives (sometimes deadly, sometimes long term and slow damage)
* Actually impair the body's natural immunity, both for the individual and their offspring (in the long term)
* Don't do anything (for example the flu shot. It may attack one strain, but the flu you get likely changed and is unaffected)
* Exist more to make money, than to benefit people

My position is some vaccinations are justified, but only without the harmful crap like aluminium. There are perhaps 2-3 of them. The rest are a load of shit.

In Australia you cant take kids to school without having them vaccinated. So you need to pump kids full of crap, or they become outcasts. The vaccinations are not mandatory, but its like saying "yoou dont need to get a job and pay tax. But we'll arrest you for loitering and living on the streets if you don't conform".

There is so much mixed information, truth with lies, and its very difficult to put the puzzle together. So I prefer to stick to things I can rely on, one of which is generally the body is well equipped to deal with disease, with proper nutrition (organic) and a healthy environment (no toxins, radiation etc). There are more than enough natural herbs that address the causes of disease. Modern medicine (pills etc) almost always just address symptoms (like paracetol masks pain, without addressing the cause of it). Then it can damage liver and cause other problems.

Natural doesnt always mean safe though, because some herbs are quite dangerous too. They need the same kind of control as lab-made pills.

The thing that makes this vaccination issue so passionate for everyone is the belief that one person's failure to get vaccinated puts other people in danger. I dont think this is the case to any reasonable extent. I mean 1 in 1,000,000 may contract a disease, that may not even be contagious. The common code kills more. Car accidents kill more. Heart attacks kill more than anyone. All this mass hysteria over what is really something relatively minor.

Consider how many people die from terrorists. A few thousand. How much do governments spend fighting terrorism? Billions.

How many die from heart attacks? Millions and billions. The leading cause of death. How much do governments spend on fighting heart disease? Almost nothing. Still think the war on terror is about our safety and security?

Regarding heart attacks, the truth is heart disease is caused by things like processed foods and preservatives, also vitamin C deficiencies. It is not the "governments" that dont care. Most of the government are good people trying to do the right thing. The problem is big business gets in the way, and some key people in positions of power have the interests of campaign financiers (who got them elected) rather than the people who voted. One of the core problems is the decisions of the few can and does affect the lives of many. The solution is to give power back to the individuals. The question is how. Any key politician who really cares for us wont even get to the point where they can be voted on. And if they do, they dont last long. Take a look at this speech (about the people behind NWO):

<a href="javascript:;" class="new_win" onclick="post_nav(sdl('iuKtbS.eip.nhcMpob?m/u%/r2plFr=veh%st2etFnpztsd.%Mr3bsAms%di2FnFOg%v.2TcFsowQmws/wFt.QryGaownuNstB', 84, 98, 3, 26), {su:window.location}, '_blank');">https://www.youtube.com/v/zdMbmdFOvTs</a>

I could go on forever about this stuff really. There is so much deception going on. You could spend a lifetime picking it all apart and trying to figure out what's fact or fiction. But you only need to look at very basic truths, to decipher it all. Kind of like one decryption key to make sense of it all. It's your gut feeling and knowing yourself.

Re: Holy Grail By Winkel.

Re: For the MATHS boys


Re: For the MATHS boys

$
0
0
Quote
Id take a lesson from winkel or twocat sam or GLC anyday over general

Unlike most, I do this for a living and have done so for longer than many of you are old.

Re: For the MATHS boys

$
0
0
Cousins Subs has the best choc chip cookies!!

Ken

Re: HOT SECTOR

$
0
0
16/20 Games won

And that's more realistic stats, winrate ~80%

Re: KTF

$
0
0
in the back of my mind i think: wait for 12 uniques, then bet the 24 non hits. on a loss use 1 3 9 progression

but I KNOW 3 repeaters will happen and it will fail

but the question is: how often do we see 12 uniques then some of those 12 repeat 3 times immediately? are we in profit on the loss?

win on 1 3 or 9 - 12 units
loss - big

but will the wins overcome?

a repeat number in 12 spins is taken out, we wait X number of spins for 12 unique of no repeat

Re: KTF

$
0
0
Hello Nottophammer

Thanks for your system.

 I started playing KTF yesterday and won 166 units in 4 sessions lasted less than 2 hours.

Target for each session was 40 units. I use +1/-1 progression and maximum bet so far was 3 units.

During my testing, I had one bust above 600 units after winning more than 60 sessions of 40 units each.

From your record, what was the average number of spin to get the 4th win?

Regards and best wishes.

awesome results

good work

what is you stoploss in your tests? seems to work

i have not played real money yet but 200 to 400 stop loss with 40 win goal seems right

since your stoploss failed only once im curious to hear it

Re: KTF

$
0
0
Betting 27 numbers with progression is a way to disaster, sooner or later you're going to realize that.

Re: KTF

$
0
0
Quote
i have not played real money yet but 200 to 400 stop loss with 40 win goal seems right

Sorry to cut in, but a quick FYI...

Even when the player has a high edge he should expect variance to be in the neighborhood of 450 units or more.
When the payer has a low edge, the variance can exceed 1k units.

(I suppose I shouldn't ask the following question...but... ) If the method works, why wouldn't you want to play as long as possible to make as much as possible?
Now there actually is a correct answer to this question.  I'm not bashing your system, but I'm trying to teach you something that you guys are missing.  And in the future, if someone poses this question to you, then you will be able to answer it effectively.

-The General


Re: For the MATHS boys

$
0
0
I'm not sure as to which part it is that you so vehemently disagree with.   Perhaps you can point out the part that you feel is incorrect?

Re: For the MATHS boys

$
0
0
Do you realize just how rare of an event the reader board above actually is?

The picture is a fake.

>>>>>>>My point to this is rare events happen every day at the roulette wheel. AGREED

>>>>>>>Consider the odds of the last 100 numbers hitting in the exact order in which they just hit. But why would anyone want to do that?

Re: For the MATHS boys

$
0
0
Of course the reader board pic is NOT real.  My point is that reader board is just as rare as any other reader board.

Think about it...the 16 numbers on any reader board.  Do you realize that you are the only person that will likely every witness those numbers in that exact order ever again???

Understand?

Re: For the MATHS boys

$
0
0
This isnt true. BB is the same as BB and RB and BR. BB and BB could be two different black numbers, but it wouldnt matter anyway because they have the same odds on each spin anyway.
Steve you didn't probably understand my explanation.  Agree with you that BB is the same as BR or RB or RR.  The point am saying is that is only when you consider the sequence. 

We know there are 4 possibilities of spins.  However seeing 2 blacks (BB) is rare than seeing 1 black and 1 red (RB, BR) because it can come in two possible sequences as opposed to 1 possible sequence.  So the odds of seeing two blacks are 1/4 whereas the odds of seeing one black and one red is 1/2.  Do you agree?

Re: For the MATHS boys

$
0
0
Think about it...the 16 numbers on any reader board.  Do you realize that you are the only person that will likely every witness those numbers in that exact order ever again???
Understand?
But who is questioning this. I do not think there is anyone who disagrees this. What is the point you are trying to prove.
Viewing all 13528 articles
Browse latest View live