Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all 13528 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: Monique1-A Decreasing 'Skip-A-Street' Street System

April 8, 2016, 9:41 pm
$
0
0
*No guarantees in gambling but I'm hopeful RG.  God bless.  \o/
==============================
Test: Celtic Casino European Wheel-
Friday, April 8,2016 @ 9:38pm CDT USA

#22 (newest spin-value)

Bet s16-18:    1.) 29(x)-15*new trigger active

Bet s22-24:    2.) 1(x)-15*

Bet s31-33:    3.) 23(x)-15*

Bet s16-18:    4.) 35(x)-15*

Bet s28-30:    5.) 31(x)-15*

Bet s25-27:    6.) 24(x)-15*

Bet s16-18:    7.) 36(x)-15*

Bet s28-30:    8.) 29(win)+165
----------------------------------------------------------
+60
==============================
Test: Celtic Casino American Wheel-
Friday, April 8,2016 @ 9:48pm CDT USA

#5 (newest spin-value)

Bet s34-36:    1.) 21(x)-15*new trigger active

Bet s13-15:    2.) 15(win)+165
----------------------------------------------------------
+150
==============================
Test: Celtic Casino European Wheel-
Friday, April 8,2016 @ 9:51pm CDT USA

#16 (newest spin-value)

Bet s10-12:      1.) 15(x)-15*new trigger active

Bet s7-9:          2.) 4(x)-15*

Bet s34-36:      3.) 8(x)-15*

Bet s1-3:          4.) 27(x)-15*

Bet s19-21:      5.) 2(x)-15*

Bet s31-33:      6.) 11(x)-15*

Bet s4-6:          7.) 29(x)-15*

Bet 22-24:        8.) 6(x)-15*

Bet 34-36:        9.) 24(x)-15*

Bet 16-18:       10.) 32(x)-15*

Bet s25-27:     11.) 26(win)+165
------------------------------------------------------------
+15
==============================
Test: Celtic Casino American Wheel-
Friday, April 8,2016 @ 10:08pm CDT USA

#6 (newest spin-value)

Bet s34-36:    1.) 29(x)-15*new trigger active

Be s22-24:     2.) 0(x)-15 [same trigger active]

3.) 1(x)-15*new trigger active

Bet s31-33:    4.) 22(x)-15*

Bet s16-18:    5.) 33(x)-15*

Bet 25-27:      6.) 2(x)-15*

Bet s31-33:    7.) 31(win)+165
-----------------------------------------------------------
+75
==============================
*Live wheels only for Monique1.  (No RNG)
↧
Search

Re: KTF's cousin named WTF (if everyone agrees)

April 8, 2016, 10:00 pm
↧
↧

Re: KTF's cousin named WTF (if everyone agrees)

April 8, 2016, 10:04 pm
$
0
0
Quote from: denzie on Yesterday at 09:57:17 PM
Another question. ... sorry ^^

Did you ever see 20 unique in a row ?  8)
RNG Or Live.
Ktf or wtf...(same sheets)

As In first 20 spins.....
No problem,  just ask i will also have many questions in the future  :wink:

Yes ones on RNG. So I had 10+5 after #20. I was really surprised  O0

But as I see it that must be speciell.
↧

Re: Hotzone

April 8, 2016, 10:28 pm
↧

Re: Monique1-A Decreasing 'Skip-A-Street' Street System

April 8, 2016, 10:33 pm
↧
↧

Re: Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

April 9, 2016, 5:25 pm
↧

Re: Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

April 9, 2016, 5:43 pm
↧

Re: Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

April 9, 2016, 5:56 pm
↧
Search

Re: Roulette tournaments

April 9, 2016, 6:19 pm
$
0
0
I have partecipated and win 100 Euro.

Sorry for this post but I need to write something to receive my winnings in the BetVoyager.com tournament to prove that the money is real.
It's a 3 day tournament with a €30000 prize fund.
Thanks everyone, I better go get my cash.
↧
↧

Re: Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

April 9, 2016, 8:07 pm
↧

Re: Betvoyager No Zero Roulette is WORSE than Single Zero Roulette. It's a scam.

April 10, 2016, 8:18 pm
$
0
0
Quote from: The General on Today at 03:08:51 AM
If you're playing online, then why on earth would you want to play the 00 game instead of the single 0 game???  I'm sure the no zero is part of a scam.

In general, playing online is a foolish bet.

Yep and thats what I dont understand about Celtic Casino. I practice there on the 00 wheel while people are betting real money on it. If you are ABLE to play there, why are you not on the 0 wheel, I dont get it?

Ken
↧

Re: Betvoyager No Zero Roulette is WORSE than Single Zero Roulette. It's a scam.

April 10, 2016, 8:29 pm
$
0
0
I thought BetVoyager had an honest RNG.  Who would have thought the casino was dishonest?
↧

Re: Betvoyager No Zero Roulette is WORSE than Single Zero Roulette. It's a scam.

April 10, 2016, 8:32 pm
$
0
0
If I had to guess (I have NO proof of this), I would say there are no honest RNGs, sorry.

Ken
↧
↧

Re: Betvoyager No Zero Roulette is WORSE than Single Zero Roulette. It's a scam.

April 10, 2016, 8:43 pm
$
0
0
In this case its not about whether or not their RNG is honest. But I dont think it is, otherwise why not just use a proper RNG certification service?

In this case, it's more about their deception with the "no zero roulette". It is misleading people into thinking they're getting a better chance of winning, when in fact the chances are WORSE.

Also I added this to help:

You need to understand the house edge. It is not complicated math. Here’s an example:

ball-under-cup

Say you are playing the game with three cups, and have to guess where the ball is. You have a 1 in 3 chance of guessing correctly. If you bet $1 on a cup and won, these are FAIR odds and payouts:

1 out of 3 times: You are correct. You get back your wagered amount PLUS TWO dollars.

2 out of 3 times: You are incorrect and lose $1.

So if you played 3 games, you are paid $2 once ($2×1=$2), and lose $1 twice ($1×2=$2). So if you have guesses with 1 in 3 accuracy, then you wont win or lose anything. You’ll just break even.

Now here’s an example of UNFAIR odds and payouts:

1 out of 3 times: You are correct. You get back your wagered amount PLUS ONE dollar.

2 out of 3 times: You are incorrect and lose $1.

Pay close attention to the red text and think about it. The odds of winning haven’t changed. What’s changed is WHEN YOU WIN, YOU ARE PAID AN UNFAIR AMOUNT. And that’s exactly what the “house edge” is. It’s something you really shouldn’t ignore.

And to take it one step further, consider that you can’t change the “payouts” the casino gives you. But you CAN change the “ODDS OF WINNING” with some strategies. For example, card counting can give you a better idea of what card will be dealt next. So you can base bet size on the expectation that you are more likely to win. And roulette computers use physics to predict where the ball will land, with enough accuracy to IMPROVE THE ODDS OF WINNING and therefore get an edge over the casino. These types of strategies are called “advantage play” by casinos specifically because they give the player the “edge”.

Now compare that to most gambling systems, which don’t even give any thought to predicting spin outcomes. Or the method they use doesn’t at all change the “odds”, like expecting after 10 reds in a row will make black more likely to spin next. In fact most roulette system players don’t even bother to test if their method of “bet selection” even changes the odds!

Bringing this all back to Beytvoyager, what they’re doing is like removing one cup, keeping the payouts the same, but then taking a large cut of whatever you win. It’s the same thing as “single zero roulette” where the casino pays you less than what’s fair.
↧

Re: Multiplayer roulette ready

April 10, 2016, 9:25 pm
$
0
0
We can make the page layout "responsive" so it better adjusts to screen sizes. But it should wrap fine for 1200 pixel screens and above. So there may be a problem on phones and small devices. I'll discuss it with the programmer soon
↧
Search

Re: Stoploss

April 11, 2016, 7:38 pm
$
0
0
Quote from: iggiv on Today at 02:33:38 AM
out of experience and practice comes this: talking about average events (most frequent events that happen) before comes a certain loss there is a chance of recovering it during a session. After this limit is over, and you get loss again there is most likely no chance to recover it, you will go down deeper and deeper almost for sure. You have to figure it out with practice and experience, you have to get feeling of it to know. It takes time and patience. And you don't always have to play real money.

100 percent agree
↧

Re: Even Stevens

April 11, 2016, 8:01 pm
$
0
0
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Yesterday at 11:24:38 PM
that was a joke by the way

for a mechanical system this does very well

i am testing BACC shoes with it now as well

I'm not sure what I was thinking when I explored this direction.  Memory tells me that
somehow I was trying to play both sides of the fence and work on singles and then
multiples. That's what I recall. Then, of course, just one side or the other.

So there WOULD be times when singles were scarce. Hence the value of the
virtual wins or losses.  But it is painful to be in a choppy area and let them all
go by.
↧
↧

Re: Betvoyager No Zero Roulette is WORSE than Single Zero Roulette. It's a scam.

April 11, 2016, 9:06 pm
$
0
0
As I much as I dont like progressions, lets be honest, where are your limits?

Meaning, even to a anti-progression person (myself included), what do you think of a 250 step progression on a street? You know that sucker would not lose. Now what about a 10 step progression on a street? (lmao)....too damn low!!

So we agree, there is SOMETHING in the middle?
....but playable? Probably not. On a fair RNG? Again, probably not.

Ken
↧

Re: Betvoyager No Zero Roulette is WORSE than Single Zero Roulette. It's a scam.

April 11, 2016, 10:39 pm
$
0
0
Table min is 5 cent. In my opinion table limits doesn't really matter, a 20 step martingale would need a bankroll of over 26K. No one's gonna sit down with 26K to win 5 cents.
Low limits are necessary, so more people can afford to play, but at the same time, the same game is available for high rollers too. With progressions, even 1 cent starting bet can be too high. I know it sounds ridiculous :) But I did play progressions on 10+ inside numbers, starting from 1 cent, and very often the draw down was €100+
↧

Re: How did I top the charts at http://www.rouletteplayers.org/

April 11, 2016, 11:19 pm
↧
Viewing all 13528 articles
Browse latest View live
Search