I think if we choose a random 10 numbers and bet the other 27 with +1 -1 we would have OK results
↧
Re: The power of RTM
↧
Re: The power of RTM
Since we´re talking about it, it´s probably worth remembering on real wheels it´s about slots, pockets. We use numbers just to identify them but we could have used words, ideograms or any other symbols. On computer RNGs it´s about real numbers, right? There is not a relationship between the pockets but there is between the numbers,
↧
↧
Re: The power of RTM
I think if we choose a random 10 numbers and bet the other 27 with +1 -1 we would have OK results
That´s what I tried to say in KTF. In a large number of trials where almost all possible combinations are present, you will find that for every bet there is a maximum number of successive wins and successive losses. For any say 24 numbers bet, such as two dozens at a time, in 100000 spins you can expect to fail up to about 21 times in a row. It can be sooner or later. For a 27 numbers bet the expected losses in a row come down to around 10. So waiting for 10 unique numbers before betting is like a virtual loss afterwhich you can bet the opposite 27 numbers knowing the worst case scenario has passed and the next spin a sure win.
↧
Any Help?
1)We are setting the Roulette EXtreme to calculate the statistical analysis of the LAST 12 spins.
2)We are opening the statistics of the STREET bets.
3)We are betting ALL the UNHIT streets with so many chips as the NUMBER of the UNHIT STREETS !
e.g.. 4 Unhit streets ...so we are betting 4 chips on the 4 unhit streets.
eg2. 3 unhit streets ...so we are betting 3 chips on the 3 unhit streets.
4)As the spins are passing , new UNHIT streets will showing and some betted streets will be HIT(win).
5)So when we are winning we are taking the bet out of the winning street and we are observing how many streets are left to bet and AGAIN we are betting all the unhit streets with exactly the same number of chips as the number of the unhit streets is....
6)Look out because in some spins we can have 1 winning street and 1 new street to appear!
So we are removing the bet of the winning one and we are adding the bet on the new unhit that appiared....and the chips will be again the same on every street(because 1 won and remove and 1 unhit appiar and we have to bet it....so again as many unhit streets we have with the same numbers of chips we will bet all the ungit streets.... Its very easy and clear....
As you will be testing you will understand why we are winning...
The number of the chips that we are betting and the number of the unhit streets is making a perfect balance !!!!!!!
please I need a coder to make this system.
And people before the coder test manually to see the results ....it will amaze you !
Ps and never forget we are betting in every spin all the unhiy streets...every unhit street must have
so many chips on it as the number of the unhit streets is....e.g. . 6 Unhit streets must have on them 6 chips each.
Here is a graph I made
Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=16909.0
2)We are opening the statistics of the STREET bets.
3)We are betting ALL the UNHIT streets with so many chips as the NUMBER of the UNHIT STREETS !
e.g.. 4 Unhit streets ...so we are betting 4 chips on the 4 unhit streets.
eg2. 3 unhit streets ...so we are betting 3 chips on the 3 unhit streets.
4)As the spins are passing , new UNHIT streets will showing and some betted streets will be HIT(win).
5)So when we are winning we are taking the bet out of the winning street and we are observing how many streets are left to bet and AGAIN we are betting all the unhit streets with exactly the same number of chips as the number of the unhit streets is....
6)Look out because in some spins we can have 1 winning street and 1 new street to appear!
So we are removing the bet of the winning one and we are adding the bet on the new unhit that appiared....and the chips will be again the same on every street(because 1 won and remove and 1 unhit appiar and we have to bet it....so again as many unhit streets we have with the same numbers of chips we will bet all the ungit streets.... Its very easy and clear....
As you will be testing you will understand why we are winning...
The number of the chips that we are betting and the number of the unhit streets is making a perfect balance !!!!!!!
please I need a coder to make this system.
And people before the coder test manually to see the results ....it will amaze you !
Ps and never forget we are betting in every spin all the unhiy streets...every unhit street must have
so many chips on it as the number of the unhit streets is....e.g. . 6 Unhit streets must have on them 6 chips each.
Here is a graph I made
Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=16909.0
↧
Re: Any Help?
well explained.
↧
↧
Re: KTF's cousin named WTF (if everyone agrees)
Program only aired for 79 minutes so not many spins.Code: [Select]jackpot247 26.4.16
1 27
2 4
3 31
4 2
5 2
6 12
7 35
8 35
9 25
10 27
11 9
12 21
13 15
14 5
15 14
16 1
17 18
18 1
19 15
20 27
21 23
22 36
23 12
24 20
25 22
26 36
27 35
28 0
29 26
30 6
31 25
32 12
33 14
34 20
35 6
36 26
37 16
38 4
39 0
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Thanks for the numbers Notto.
OK time for you guys to try this.
Note that this session depends more on the Count, LOTT and Nottos averages than G.U.T.
If you have been following WTF you should be able to get $80 profit (I covered the 0) or $87 if you do not cover the 0, in 4 spins once you start betting.
Ill give you a hint how to start ----- With 5 repeats in the first 20 spins you should realize that you have to do a reset but even earlier after spin 10 the 3 repeats so far should have told you to reset then.
-Celtic
↧
Re: KTF WTF
so ive been checking my sheets as well with notto's .... couldnt find any with 10 repeaters...so how do we bet this?
also 98% can have a hit in spin 21-25 and another in spin 26-30( using a 5 step progression)
......any thoughts?
also 98% can have a hit in spin 21-25 and another in spin 26-30( using a 5 step progression)
......any thoughts?
↧
Re: Has roulette been beat? Yes? Thats awesome!!
Thats why i post methods even if they sound dumb. You never know if it may spark an idea in someone else
Well said Ghost!
↧
$1,000 Per Day
Who here makes a minimum of $1,000 per day playing roulette? No minimum per week, just hitting that goal more often than not when you do play.
Thanks
Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=16919.0
Thanks
Linkback: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=16919.0
↧
↧
Re: Will you ever acknowledge the existence of the Grail witout VB?
↧
Re: KTF's cousin named WTF (if everyone agrees)
1s and 2s
![:love:]( "Love")
↧
Re: KTF WTF
Thx Notto....good to know.
Ever saw that in 21-30?![:)]( "Smiley")
If not...how would you bet here ?
A 10 step progression?
A 2x5 step progression (one hit in 21-25 and one hit in 26-30)
Start from spin 26?
After a loss(very very rare) bet with higher units?
......
Happy to hear your thoughts
Ever saw that in 21-30?
If not...how would you bet here ?
A 10 step progression?
A 2x5 step progression (one hit in 21-25 and one hit in 26-30)
Start from spin 26?
After a loss(very very rare) bet with higher units?
......
Happy to hear your thoughts
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
These 2 quotes seems like a contradiction?
Quote
verythign that happens in roulette happens in a cycle. A cycle starts and ends when a number repeats.
For the dozens, lets see that it will be like this.
19
25
18 – This is a dozen cycle of length 2
19
20 – This is a dozen cycle of length 1
18
31
1
30 – This si a dozen cycle of length 3.
Quote
Quote from: klw on April 06, 2016, 10:03:57 AM
Can someone please confirm that the spin to end/define a cycle is included as the first spin of the next cycle ( A ) or is a fresh new/next spin the first for the next cycle ( B ) as the stats for both are totally different.
Cheers.
(A) is the right approach
↧
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
These 2 quotes seems like a contradiction?
I dont think so
First quote defines a cycle 121 or 22 or 1321
Second quote asks if the next cycle is started with the last or is it the next.
121133 is 2 cycles defined by 1 and a cycle defined by 3 not 1 cycle defined by 1 and 1 cycle defined by 3 with a stray 1 in the middle.
as I see it
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
These 2 quotes seems like a contradiction?
121 would be a cycle of 3
11 would be a cycle of 2
Yes, the last is included as the start of a new cycle.
This:
121
11
... Is really only 4 spins.
Make sense?
↧
Re: DEAD SOLID EDGE!
Yes Turner you doing your job very well ![:thumbsup:]( "Thumbs-up")
good to have you here.
good to have you here.
↧
Re: DEAD SOLID EDGE!
Yes Turner you doing your job very wellWell I dont usually hear that...so I will take it...print it off and frame it lolgood to have you here.
↧
↧
Re: Multiplayer roulette ready
same for me...And me.. that's a shame.
↧
Re: Multiplayer roulette ready
And me...both on Chrome & Edge (Windows 10)
↧
Re: Multiplayer roulette ready
What is the ready checkbox for?
↧