Where did you get that figure?
↧
Re: Multiplayer roulette ready
↧
Re: Multiplayer roulette ready
the amount of spins really dont mean as much as is talked about here.... unless its an absurdly low amount......
If people can win more in less spins and it continues , thats obviously the superior system by far!!!!!! the idea is to win as much as possible per spin.....continue doing that and you have the cats meow......
If people can win more in less spins and it continues , thats obviously the superior system by far!!!!!! the idea is to win as much as possible per spin.....continue doing that and you have the cats meow......
↧
↧
Re: Multiplayer roulette ready
the amount of spins really dont mean as much as is talked about here.... unless its an absurdly low amount......
If people can win more in less spins and it continues , thats obviously the superior system by far!!!!!! the idea is to win as much as possible per spin.....continue doing that and you have the cats meow......
Thats how i feel
↧
Re: Multiplayer roulette ready
HE etc.... yeah if you play non stop the same thing. Yep it will catch you. But roulette has patterns that come and go. So triggers can work. For example. ... we see 7 times doz 1 repeat. We gonna see that 3 times in one hour ? No. It's possible? Yes. But will it ? No .
10x red. Cool. 15 minutes later another 10x red. Cool. 15 minutes later another 10x red. Of course it's possible. But some will never see it in there life.
These just easy examples. It's not about limits ...but we know what the wheel spits out on average. Same with gut...it's made on millions of spins to see what happens. And tadaaa. ... we can exploit it even though the non bet nrs have the same odds of hitting.
10x red. Cool. 15 minutes later another 10x red. Cool. 15 minutes later another 10x red. Of course it's possible. But some will never see it in there life.
These just easy examples. It's not about limits ...but we know what the wheel spits out on average. Same with gut...it's made on millions of spins to see what happens. And tadaaa. ... we can exploit it even though the non bet nrs have the same odds of hitting.
↧
Re: Multiplayer roulette ready
Unfortunately your beliefs in "limits" are rooted in the gambler's fallacy, and your examples aren't very good.
↧
↧
Re: KTF
Wont be around for a whileI just want to say that I'm really thankful to you and I have learned alot with both KTF and WTF. My roulette game have improved alot.
Good luck
Now I'm learning the gut. I have come so long that I'm using it now. Really funny.
Hope you will have it good!
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
Why does that matter? Totally irrelevant.
If you really care, read the three biggest roulette forums, and you will find the answer.
If you really care, read the three biggest roulette forums, and you will find the answer.
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
Why does that matter? Totally irrelevant.
If you really care, read the three biggest roulette forums, and you will find the answer.
No, thanks. I'm not interested in the game within the game.
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
Thanks ati - read it. And Pri - nice to see you lurking here. I see your corrections - noted.
I need 24 hours to go back and analyse the first 6 pages and then the vids. The only thing that gives me pause is the veiled references to Parrondo's Paradox. I understand that well, and have tested it to the death. The actual mathematical phenomenon involved can not be applied to gambling systems - the odds will not allow it as there is no positive advantage bet. There are odds-on bets but they are still not positive advantage which PP requires for one of the B bets. Others have tried too and all have failed. PP itself is of no value to us.
So -where does that leave us? Well, I can only assume that the references to PP are only done as similes - not for actual use. That you use 2 non-random events and that you alternate them in some fashion that is for us to discover. Actually, we also have to discover the 2nd non-random event don't we? I know it is probably on the 6-lines but it can't be VdW because this would be far too complex - even the dozens have a sequence length of 27 and nobody is able to accurately find all the AP's in that on the fly. Does anybody have any idea what the 2nd non-random event might be?
Oh well, let the head scratching begin! There is way too much so far undiscovered for us to be able to derive anything useful.
Rog
This may help. Based on the 97 cycles I tested:
1. 38 ended on the first spin
2. 43 ended in 2 spins
3. 16 ended in 3 spins
4. Based on this, 39% hit on the first spin. If playing last 2 dozens on the second spin, I would've got a 73% rate.
Stats show better than expected returns. Not sure if it's due to varience or edge until further testing
↧
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
I forgot to mention that 15 out of 16 cycles that ended with 3 spins were would've been won betting the last 2 dozen hit within that cycle. ![:)]( "Smiley")
↧
Re: KTF
Thanks Celticknits!
I just looked at the average and did not study the sheet in detail, sorry. Next time I be more accurate.
- Tuddilue
-Tuddilue
Not a problem my friend.
Hey look I screwed up the initial payout sheet after the Win/Stop was reached and reposted the correction.
Because of all the sheets I do for other people I get kinda lazy sometimes and do not always check the numbers AFTER I hit the Win/Stop.
-Celtic
↧
Re: Something I *THINK* got from Priyankas thread
I think Richard got a bit carried away last night. Perhaps he should think twice before drinking and posting.
I did my best to turn his negative attacks into something positive, but his rants and name calling continued post after post.
Thank goodness we have the General to keep things positive around here!!!
Where would we be without him........
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
drazen,
i proposed this many times this particular concept and i was only attacked
is that only because RG posted it?
Of course not
What Priyanka showed with this is not playing concept. It is just starting point for better understanding of it. There are still few things which must be involved here before we can figure it out.
Priyanka is also not applying heavy progressions like you were, and I think that would be the main objection from what you advocated. Your betselection in particular is not worse then any other with such odds but applying martingale on it is what shouldnt be done.
↧
↧
Re: Something I *THINK* got from Priyankas thread
Quote
Thank goodness we have the General to keep things positive around here!!!
Where would we be without him........
↧
Re: Something I *THINK* got from Priyankas thread
So this is actually "the General"...........looks old enough to read a Wikipedia page.............everything makes sense now.
↧
Re: KTF
01/05/16 - SkyVagas (RNG)
+29 profit.
Results attached.
Played 4 times now.
+36
+27
+27
+29
Total = +119
My aim is approx £30!
+29 profit.
Results attached.
Played 4 times now.
+36
+27
+27
+29
Total = +119
My aim is approx £30!
↧
Re: KTF
Good job
Lets hope before the 1st bust your profits cover it
Good luck and i look forward to your future sheets
Lets hope before the 1st bust your profits cover it
Good luck and i look forward to your future sheets
↧
↧
Re: KTF
01/05/16 - SkyVagas (RNG)
+29 profit.
Results attached.
Played 4 times now.
+36
+27
+27
+29
Total = +119
My aim is approx £30!
Whatch out for that RNG,its tricky
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
What is the 12 spin dozen cycle, and why is it non random?
↧
Re: Random Thoughts
What is the 12 spin dozen cycle, and why is it non random?
There are 3 possible combinations so in 4 sets, one has to repeat.
↧